首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >Single-injection or continuous femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty?
【24h】

Single-injection or continuous femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty?

机译:单次注射或连续股神经阻滞用于全膝关节置换术?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The ideal local anesthetic regime for femoral nerve block that balances analgesia with mobility after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains undefined. Questions/purposes: We compared two volumes and concentrations of a fixed dose of ropivacaine for continuous femoral nerve block after TKA to a single injection femoral nerve block with ropivacaine to determine (1) time to discharge readiness; (2) early pain scores and analgesic consumption; and (3) functional outcomes, including range of motion and WOMAC scores at the time of recovery. Methods: Ninety-nine patientswere allocated to one of three continuous femoral nerve block groups for this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial: a high concentration group (ropivacaine 0.2%infusion), a low concentration group (ropivacaine 0.1% infusion), or a placebo infusion group (saline 0.9% infusion). Infusions were discontinued on post-operative Day (POD) 2. The primary outcome was time to discharge readiness. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, pain, and functional outcomes. Ninety-three patients completed the study protocol; the study was halted early because of unanticipated changes to pain protocols at the host institution, by which time only 61% of the required number of patients had been enrolled. Results: With the numbers available, the mean time to discharge readiness was not different between groups (high concentration group, 62 hours [95% confidence interval [CI], 51-72 hours]; low concentration group, 73 hours [95% CI, 63-83 hours]; placebo infusion group 65 hours [95% CI, 56-75 hours]; p = 0.27). Patients in the low concentration group consumed significantly less morphine during the period of infusion (POD 1, high concentration group, 56 mg [95% CI, 42-70 mg]; low concentration group, 35 mg [95% CI, 27-43 mg]; placebo infusion group, 48 mg [95% CI, 38-59 mg], p = 0.02; POD 2, high concentration group, 50 mg [95% CI, 41-60 mg]; low concentration group, 33 mg [95% CI, 24-42 mg]; placebo infusion group, 39 mg [95% CI, 30-48 mg], p = 0.04); however, there were no important differences in pain scores or opioid-related side effects with the numbers available. Likewise, there were no important differences in functional outcomes between groups. Conclusions: Based on this study, which was terminated prematurely before the desired sample size could be achieved, we were unable to demonstrate that varying the concentration and volume of a fixed-dose ropivacaine infusion for continuous femoral nerve block influences time to discharge readiness when compared with a conventional single-injection femoral nerve block after TKA. A low concentration of ropivacaine infusion can reduce postoperative opioid consumption but without any important differences in pain scores, side effects, or functional outcomes. These pilot data may be used to inform the statistical power of future randomized trials. Level of Evidence: Level II, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
机译:背景:目前尚无确定理想的股神经阻滞局部麻醉方案,该方案在全膝关节置换术(TKA)后平衡止痛和活动性。问题/目的:我们比较了TKA后连续两次股神经阻滞的固定剂量罗哌卡因的两种体积和浓度与罗哌卡因单次注射股神经阻滞的比较,以确定(1)准备就绪的时间; (2)早期疼痛评分和止痛药的使用; (3)功能结果,包括恢复时的运动范围和WOMAC评分。方法:在这项随机,安慰剂对照,双盲试验中,将99例患者分为三个连续的股神经阻滞组之一:高浓度组(罗哌卡因0.2%输注),低浓度组(罗哌卡因0.1%输注) ,或安慰剂输注组(盐水0.9%输注)。术后第2天(POD)停止输液。主要结果是准备出院的时间。次要结果包括阿片类药物的消耗,疼痛和功能性结果。九十三名患者完成了研究方案。由于宿主机构意外改变了疼痛方案,因此该研究被提前终止,当时只有61%的所需患者入组。结果:根据可获得的数字,两组之间的平均出院准备时间没有差异(高浓度组为62小时[95%置信区间[CI],51-72小时];低浓度组为73小时[95%CI] ,63-83小时];安慰剂输注组65小时[95%CI,56-75小时; p = 0.27)。低浓度组患者在输液期间消耗的吗啡明显减少(POD 1,高浓度组56 mg [95%CI,42-70 mg];低浓度组35 mg [95%CI,27-43] mg];安慰剂输注组48 mg [95%CI,38-59 mg],p = 0.02; POD 2,高浓度组,50 mg [95%CI,41-60 mg];低浓度组,33 mg [95%CI,24-42 mg];安慰剂输注组,39 mg [95%CI,30-48 mg],p = 0.04);但是,疼痛分数或与阿片类药物相关的副作用与可用数字没有重要差异。同样,各组之间的功能结局也没有重要差异。结论:根据这项研究,该研究在获得所需样本量之前就已提前终止,我们无法证明固定剂量罗哌卡因输注连续股神经阻滞的浓度和体积会影响出院准备时间TKA后常规单次注射股神经阻滞。低浓度的罗哌卡因输注可以减少术后阿片类药物的消耗,但在疼痛评分,副作用或功能结局方面没有任何重要差异。这些先导数据可用于告知未来随机试验的统计能力。证据级别:II级,治疗研究。有关证据水平的完整说明,请参见《作者指南》。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号