...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association >How to increase seasonal influenza vaccine coverage
【24h】

How to increase seasonal influenza vaccine coverage

机译:如何增加季节性流感疫苗的覆盖率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background Insertion of needles into the spinal or epidural space is an important component of modern anesthetic practice. Needles are usually inserted at or below the L3-L4 intervertebral space to minimize the risk of spinal cord injury. Manual palpation is the most common method for identifying intervertebral spaces. However, anesthesiologists are increasingly using ultrasonography to guide the placement of regional, including neuraxial, anesthetic, and analgesic blocks. We undertook an observational study to compare the accuracy of manual palpation and ultrasound for determining the L 3-L4 intervertebral space level. Methods Thirty children 0-12 years of age undergoing lumbar puncture were enrolled. For each subject, an anesthesiologist, using the landmark palpation method, determined the point on a radio-opaque ruler that corresponded to the L3-L4 intervertebral space. A different anesthesiologist using the ultrasound method repeated this measurement. Fluoroscopy was then used to confirm the accuracy of each technique. The proportion of inaccurate measurements and the effects of anesthesiologists' experience, patient age, and size on the accuracy of each technique were compared. Results Thirty-seven percent of measurements by the landmark palpation method were inaccurate by ≥1 levels cephalad to the L 3-L4 intervertebral space. However, less experienced anesthesiologists (residents and fellows) made a disproportionate number of inaccurate measurements compared to consultants. Twenty-three percent of measurements by the ultrasound method were inaccurate by ≥1 cephalad levels. The BMI-for-age percentile/weight-for-length percentile was higher in patients in whom either technique was inaccurate. Conclusion This observational study found no difference in the accuracy of landmark palpation, when performed by a consultant anesthesiologist, and ultrasound for determining the L 3-L4 intervertebral space in children.
机译:背景技术将针插入脊柱或硬膜外腔是现代麻醉实践的重要组成部分。通常将针头插入L3-L4椎间隙或以下,以最大程度地降低脊髓损伤的风险。人工触诊是识别椎间隙的最常见方法。但是,麻醉学家越来越多地使用超声检查来指导区域的放置,包括神经阻滞,麻醉和镇痛药。我们进行了一项观察性研究,以比较手动触诊和超声检查确定L 3-L4椎间隙水平的准确性。方法选取30例0-12岁的腰椎穿刺儿童作为研究对象。对于每个受试者,麻醉师使用路标触诊法确定不透射线的直尺上对应于L3-L4椎间隙的点。使用超声方法的另一位麻醉师重复进行此测量。然后使用荧光检查法确认每种技术的准确性。比较了不准确的测量比例以及麻醉师的经验,患者年龄和体型对每种技术准确性的影响。结果界标触诊法测量的37%的头颈到L 3-L4椎间隙的水平≥1级。但是,与顾问相比,经验不足的麻醉师(住院医师和研究员)进行不准确测量的比例不成比例。超声方法测量的23%的头颅水平≥1不准确。两种技术均不准确的患者的BMI年龄百分比/体重长度百分比更高。结论这项观察性研究发现,由顾问麻醉师进行的触诊触诊准确性和超声确定儿童L 3-L4椎间隙的准确性无差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号