【24h】

Response to John Morley

机译:对约翰·莫利的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Dr. Morley's and my comments concerning this controversial treatment question include areas where we agree and disagree. I concur entirely with the points Dr. Morley makes with regard to important blood pressure measurement considerations-especially postural measurements-and exercising caution in approaching antihypertensive therapy. The major area of disagreement between us is focused on our disparate interpretations of the original Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET) results. First, as evident, for example, in the evolution of recommendations regarding estrogen replacement therapy, results from randomized controlled trials should trump even well-designed epidemiological studies. The majority of the epidemiological studies that Dr. Morley cites used mortality as their primary outcome. In very old adults, prevention of disability related to stroke or congestive heart failure is more often the treatment objective than extending survival per se.
机译:莫利博士和我对这个有争议的治疗问题的评论包括我们同意和不同意的领域。我完全同意Morley博士在重要的血压测量考虑因素(尤其是姿势测量)方面的观点,并在采取降压治疗时应谨慎行事。我们之间的主要分歧集中在我们对极老试验(HYVET)结果中原发性高血压的不同解释上。首先,例如,在有关雌激素替代疗法的建议的发展过程中,显而易见的是,随机对照试验的结果应胜过精心设计的流行病学研究。 Morley博士引用的大多数流行病学研究均以死亡率为主要结果。在非常大的成年人中,与延长生存本身本身相比,预防与中风或充血性心力衰竭相关的残疾往往是治疗的目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号