...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry >Review of safety assessment methods used in pediatric psychopharmacology.
【24h】

Review of safety assessment methods used in pediatric psychopharmacology.

机译:回顾儿科心理药理学中使用的安全性评估方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Elicitation is an essential and critical step in ascertaining adverse events (AEs). This report reviews elicitation methods used in published clinical trials of psychopharmacological agents in children. METHOD: Pediatric psychopharmacology reports were reviewed for safety methods in the Medline database. Studies were included if they were published 1980 or later, provided data on AEs, and described the ascertainment methodology used for determining them. RESULTS: A review of 196 pediatric psychopharmacology articles depicting safety assessments in clinical studies over the past 22 years revealed that there was no common method used for eliciting or reporting AE data. CONCLUSION: The current inconsistency in safety data ascertainment is a major limitation that likely impairs the ability to promptly and accurately identify drug-induced AEs. Research on how best to standardize safety methods should be considered a priority in pediatric psychopharmacology.
机译:目的:激发是确定不良事件(AE)的关键和关键步骤。该报告回顾了在儿童心理药理学药物的已发表临床试验中使用的诱发方法。方法:在Medline数据库中对儿科心理药理学报告进行了安全性方法审查。如果研究发表于1980年或之后,包括AE的数据,并描述了用于确定它们的确定方法,则将其纳入研究。结果:回顾了196篇描述过去22年临床研究中安全性评估的儿科心理药理学文章,结果表明,没有通用的方法来获取或报告AE数据。结论:目前在安全性数据确定方面的不一致是一个主要限制,可能会损害及时准确地识别药物诱发的不良事件的能力。小儿心理药理学应优先研究如何最好地标准化安全方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号