首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >Trunk muscle endurance tests: effect of trunk posture on test outcome.
【24h】

Trunk muscle endurance tests: effect of trunk posture on test outcome.

机译:躯干肌肉耐力测试:躯干姿势对测试结果的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of different trunk postures during the abdominal flexor test on isometric endurance holding times and surface electromyographic (EMG) activity of contributing trunk flexor and extensor muscles in 16 healthy college-age male rowers (age, 22.0 +/- 1.55 years; height, 179.1 +/- 5.47 cm; weight, 68.0 +/- 4.18 kg) with a minimum of 12 months rowing experience. Subjects performed 2 maximal effort abdominal flexor tests, 1 held with correct posture and the other with a slightly flexed incorrect trunk posture. Maximum holding time was assessed for each posture while EMG muscle activity was recorded for the external oblique, rectus abdominis, internal oblique, rectus femoris, and lumbar erector spinae muscles. Mean maximal holding time for the incorrectly positioned abdominal flexor test was significantly longer than for the correct position (p < 0.05). EMG activity during the first and last 20% of a time normalized comparison showed significantly lower muscle activity during the incorrect trunk posture in all muscles investigated (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in muscle activity when comparing an equivalent time period at the actual termination of each of the 2 abdominal flexor tests. Although minor variations in trunk posture seem to be acceptable in practice of this isometric abdominal flexor test, the present data indicate that minor lumbar kyphosis deviating away from the correct abdominal flexor test posture can significantly skew test reliability, resulting in longer endurance holding times and relatively lower muscle activity of the trunk muscles.
机译:这项研究的目的是调查16名健康的大学年龄男性赛艇运动员在腹部屈肌测试过程中不同躯干姿势对等距耐力保持时间和贡献性躯干屈肌和伸肌的表面肌电图(EMG)活动的影响(年龄,22.0 +/- 1.55年;身高179.1 +/- 5.47厘米;体重68.0 +/- 4.18公斤),至少有12个月的划船经验。受试者进行了2次最大的腹部屈肌测试,其中1次以正确的姿势进行握持,另一位以稍微弯曲的不正确的躯干姿势进行握持。评估每种姿势的最大保持时间,同时记录外斜肌,腹直肌,内斜肌,股直肌和腰直肌脊柱肌的EMG肌肉活动。位置不正确的腹部屈肌测试的平均最大保持时间明显长于正确位置的时间(p <0.05)。标准化比较的前20%和最后20%的EMG活动显示,在所调查的所有肌肉中,错误的躯干姿势期间的肌肉活动明显降低(p <0.05)。在两次腹部屈肌测验的实际终止时比较等效时间段时,肌肉活动没有显着差异(p> 0.05)。尽管在进行这种等距的腹部屈肌测试时,躯干姿势的微小变化似乎是可以接受的,但目前的数据表明,偏离正确的腹部屈肌测试姿势的较小的腰椎后凸畸形会大大歪曲测试的可靠性,从而导致更长的耐力保持时间和相对较长的耐力降低躯干肌肉的肌肉活动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号