...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research: JSLHR >Story narratives of adults with closed head injury and non-brain-injured adults: influence of socioeconomic status, elicitation task, and executive functioning.
【24h】

Story narratives of adults with closed head injury and non-brain-injured adults: influence of socioeconomic status, elicitation task, and executive functioning.

机译:闭合性颅脑损伤成年人和非脑损伤成年人的故事叙述:社会经济地位,启发任务和执行功能的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Narratives were elicited in two story tasks, retelling and generation, from two groups of adults, 55 with closed head injury (CHI) and 47 non-brain-injured (NBI), recruited from rehabilitation facilities in three northeastern states. Participants were classified, on the basis of their socioeconomic status (SES), as professional, skilled worker, or unskilled worker. Narratives were analyzed using five discourse measures at the levels of sentence production, intersentential cohesion, and story grammar. Discourse performance was then compared across groups, tasks, and SES levels. Discourse performance of the CHI group was also compared with their scores from the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, a measure of executive functioning. Results indicated that two discourse measures distinguished the groups. The CHI participants produced significantly fewer words per T-unit and fewer T-units within episode structure than did the NBI group, which was attributed to difficulties with content organization. Performance onall five discourse measures differed for the story retelling versus the story generation tasks for both CHI and NBI groups. All participants produced longer and more grammatically complex T-units in the story generation task than in story retelling. However, cohesive adequacy and story grammar were better in the story retelling task than in the story generation task. It was therefore concluded that story generation was a more challenging task than story retelling for both groups. The only significant difference noted for SES involved the measure of intersentential cohesion. The unskilled workers demonstrated poorer cohesive adequacy than either the skilled workers or professionals, regardless of group or story task. Finally, modest correlations were noted between the discourse performance of the CHI group and scores from the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in both story tasks.
机译:从东北三个州的康复机构招募的两组成年人中,有55位患有闭合性头部受伤(CHI)和47位无脑损伤(NBI)的成年人,讲述了两个故事任务,即重述和产生。根据参加者的社会经济地位(SES)将其分类为专业,熟练工人或非熟练工人。使用五种话语量度对叙述进行了分析,这些量度包括句子产生,句子内聚和故事语法的水平。然后比较各小组,任务和SES级别的话语表现。还将CHI组的话语表现与威斯康星州卡片分类测验的分数进行比较,该测验是执行功能的一种度量。结果表明,两种话语措施区分了群体。与NBI组相比,CHI参与者每个T单元产生的单词少得多,情节结构中产生的T单元也少得多,这归因于内容组织上的困难。对于CHI和NBI小组,故事重述与故事生成任务的全部五种话语量度均有所不同。与故事重述相比,与故事重述相比,所有参与者在故事生成任务中产生的时间更长,语法上更复杂。但是,在故事重述任务中,内聚的充分性和故事语法比在故事生成任务中要好。因此可以得出结论,对于两个小组来说,故事的产生都比故事重述更具挑战性。 SES注意到的唯一显着差异涉及句间凝聚力的度量。无论小组或故事的任务如何,与非熟练工人或专业人士相比,非熟练工人的凝聚力充分性较差。最后,在两个故事任务中,CHI组的话语表现与威斯康星卡片分类测试的分数之间存在适度的相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号