首页> 外文期刊>Journal of rehabilitation medicine : >No significant differences between intervention programmes on neck, shoulder and low back pain: a prospective randomized study among home-care personnel.
【24h】

No significant differences between intervention programmes on neck, shoulder and low back pain: a prospective randomized study among home-care personnel.

机译:颈部,肩膀和下背部疼痛的干预计划之间没有显着差异:一项家庭护理人员的前瞻性随机研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The effects of two different prevention programmes on: (1) reported neck, shoulder and back pain, (2) perceived physical exertion at work and perceived work-related psychosocial factors, were evaluated by questionnaires after 12 and 18 months. Female nursing aides and assistant nurses (n = 282) working in the home-care services, were randomly assigned to one of three groups for: (1) individually designed physical training programme, (2) work-place stress management, (3) control group. Results revealed no significant differences between the three groups. However, improvements in low back pain were registered within both intervention groups for up to 18 months. Perceived physical exertion at work was reduced in the physical training group. Improvements in neck and shoulder pain did not differ within the three groups. Dissatisfaction with work-related, psychosocial factors was generally increased in all groups. As the aetiology of neck, shoulder and back disorders is multifactorial, a combination of the two intervention programmes might be preferable and should be further studied.
机译:在12和18个月后,通过问卷调查评估了两种不同的预防计划对以下方面的影响:(1)报告的颈部,肩部和背部疼痛;(2)感知的工作中的体力消耗以及感知到的与工作相关的社会心理因素。在家庭护理服务中工作的女性护理助手和助理护士(n = 282)被随机分配到以下三个组之一:(1)个性化设计的体育锻炼计划;(2)工作场所压力管理;(3)控制组。结果显示三组之间无显着差异。然而,两个干预组的腰痛改善均达到18个月。体能训练组减少了工作中的体力劳动。三组中颈部和肩部疼痛的改善无差异。在所有组中,与工作相关的社会心理因素的不满情绪普遍增加。由于颈部,肩部和背部疾病的病因是多因素的,因此两种干预方案的结合可能是更可取的,应进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号