首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis >Evaluation of Water Supply Augmentation and Water Demand Management Options for the City of Cape Town
【24h】

Evaluation of Water Supply Augmentation and Water Demand Management Options for the City of Cape Town

机译:开普敦市供水增强和需水管理方案评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper discusses an application of MCDA to integrated water resource planning for the City of Cape Town. As a result of rapid growth in recent years, there has been increasing pressures on limited water resources, leading by the end of 2000 to severe restrictions having to be imposed on consumers. Planners needed thus to develop and to evaluate options both for water supply augmentation and for water demand management. The role of structuring these problems in MCDA terms, in order to facilitate a common understanding between a number of interest groups, is first discussed. Thereafter, the use of simple multiattribute value functions to score the various supply and demand management options in a group setting is described. One advantage of this approach was that when additional alternatives were proposed at a later date, their evaluation could easily be incorporated with the earlier results. The intention during this study was to identify high priority interventions (which may need to be implemented quickly), as well as options that are probably not worth implementing in the short term. It is recognized that at a later stage, the high priority items may need to be 'packaged' into a number of alternative policy scenarios, which will be evaluated in more holistic terms. At the time of writing, the results of the analysis described here had been presented as a single proposal to the city council, and have led to more detailed design studies for implementation.
机译:本文讨论了MCDA在开普敦市水资源综合规划中的应用。由于近年来的快速增长,对有限水资源的压力越来越大,导致到2000年底必须对消费者施加严格的限制。因此,计划者需要开发和评估增加供水和水需求管理的方案。首先讨论了以MCDA术语构造这些问题的作用,以促进多个利益集团之间的共识。此后,描述了使用简单的多属性值函数对组设置中的各种供需管理选项进行评分。这种方法的一个优点是,当以后提出其他替代方案时,可以轻松地将其评估结果与早期结果结合在一起。这项研究的目的是确定高优先级的干预措施(可能需要迅速实施),以及短期内可能不值得实施的选择。人们认识到,在稍后阶段,可能需要将高优先级项目“打包”到许多替代性政策方案中,将以更全面的方式对其进行评估。在撰写本文时,此处描述的分析结果已作为一个提案提交给了市议会,并导致了更详细的设计研究以供实施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号