【24h】

The ethics of end-of-life research.

机译:报废研究的伦理学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A notable and welcome increase in palliative care research has led to a multitude of ethical issues and concerns for researchers, clinicians, patients (subjects) and their family members (who also might be subjects), granting agencies, and professional journals. This edition of "Palliative Care Pearls" summarizes the recommendations from a work group that met at the National Institutes of Health in September, 2002. The primary purpose for that meeting was to explore the unique characteristics of this research population and the ethical concerns that might require tailoring of "standard" clinical research processes. The proceedings culminated in a document from which open discourse and a more formal set of guidelines might emanate to both foster more and better research, while providing protections for research subjects. This 62 page long monograph was published as a supplement to the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (April, 2003). It includes six "plenary" papers, each that focuses on a distinct ethical domain of palliative care research and concludes with a set of recommendations and research questions. These might best be viewed as hypotheses that need to be tested or further explored.
机译:姑息治疗研究的显着且受欢迎的增长导致研究人员,临床医生,患者(受试者)及其家庭成员(也可能是受试者)​​,资助机构和专业期刊出现许多道德问题和关注。本期“姑息治疗珍珠”总结了一个工作组的建议,该工作组于2002年9月在美国国立卫生研究院开会。该会议的主要目的是探讨该研究人群的独特特征以及可能引起的伦理关注。需要定制“标准”临床研究过程。会议程序最终形成了一份文件,从中可能会出现公开讨论和更正式的准则集,以促进更多更好的研究,同时为研究对象提供保护。这本长达62页的专着已作为《疼痛与症状管理杂志》(2003年4月)的增刊发行。它包括六篇“全会式”论文,每篇都着重于姑息治疗研究的不同伦理领域,并以一系列建议和研究问题作为结尾。最好将这些视为需要检验或进一步探讨的假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号