首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Medicinal Chemistry >Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship study of the cannabimimetic (aminoalkyl)indoles using comparative molecular field analysis.
【24h】

Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship study of the cannabimimetic (aminoalkyl)indoles using comparative molecular field analysis.

机译:使用比较分子场分析法研究拟大麻素(氨基烷基)吲哚的三维定量构效关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The present study describes the implementation of comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) to develop two 3D-QSAR (quantitative structure-activity relationship) models (CoMFA models 1 and 2) of the cannabimimetic (aminoalkyl)indoles (AAIs) for CB1 cannabinoid receptor binding affinity, based on pKi values measured using radioligand binding assays that displace two different agonist ligands, [3H]CP-55940 and [3H]WIN-55212-2. Both models exhibited a strong correlation between the calculated steric-electrostatic fields and the observed biological activity for the respective training set compounds. In light of the basicity of the morpholine nitrogen in the AAIs, separate CoMFA models were built for the AAIs as unprotonated and protonated species. Comparison of the statistical parameters resulting from these CoMFA models failed to provide unequivocal evidence as to whether the AAIs are protonated or neutral as receptor-bound species. Although the training sets of CoMFA model 1 and CoMFA model 2 differed with respect to composition and to the choice of displacement radioligand in each biological assay, their CoMFA StDevCoeff contour plots reveal similarities in terms of identifying those regions around the AAIs that are important for CB1 cannabinoid receptor binding such as the sterically favored region around the C3 aroyl group and the sterically forbidden region around the indole ring. When the experimental pKi values for the training set compounds to displace the AAI radioligand [3H]WIN-55212-2 were plotted against the pKi values as predicted for the same compounds to displace the cannabinoid radioligand [3H]CP-55940, the correlation was moderately strong (r = 0.73). However, the degree of correlation may have been lowered by the structural differences in the compounds comprising the training sets for CoMFA model 1 and CoMFA model 2. Taken together, the results of this study suggest that the binding site region within the CB1 cannabinoid receptor can accommodate a wide range of structurally diverse cannabimimetic analogues including the AAIs.
机译:本研究描述了比较分子场分析(CoMFA)的实施,以开发大麻素(氨基烷基)吲哚(AAI)的两个3D-QSAR(定量结构-活性关系)模型(CoMFA模型1和2),用于CB1大麻素受体结合亲和力,基于使用放射性配体结合测定法测得的pKi值,该测定法置换了两个不同的激动剂配体[3H] CP-55940和[3H] WIN-55212-2。两种模型都显示出在计算出的空间静电场与相应训练组化合物的观察到的生物活性之间的强相关性。根据AAI中吗啉氮的碱性,针对AAI建立了非质子化和质子化物种的单独CoMFA模型。由这些CoMFA模型得出的统计参数的比较未能提供明确的证据证明AAI是质子化的还是中性的(作为受体结合的物种)。尽管CoMFA模型1和CoMFA模型2的训练集在每种生物学测定中的成分和位移放射性配体的选择方面有所不同,但它们的CoMFA StDevCoeff等高线图在识别AAI周围对CB1重要的区域方面显示出相似性大麻素受体结合,例如C3芳酰基周围的空间偏爱区域和吲哚环周围的空间禁忌区域。当针对替换AAI放射性配体[3H] WIN-55212-2的训练组化合物的实验pKi值与针对相同化合物替代大麻素放射性配体[3H] CP-55940的预测的pKi值作图时,相关性为中等强(r = 0.73)。但是,相关程度可能由于包含针对CoMFA模型1和CoMFA模型2的训练集的化合物的结构差异而降低了。总而言之,这项研究的结果表明,CB1大麻素受体内的结合位点区域可以可以容纳包括AAI在内的各种结构多样的类似大麻的类似物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号