首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Mathematical Psychology >On elemental and configural models of associative learning
【24h】

On elemental and configural models of associative learning

机译:联想学习的基本模型和配置模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The elemental and configural approaches to associative learning are considered fundamentally distinct, with much theoretical and empirical work devoted to determining which one can better account for empirical data. Elemental models assume that each perceptual element is capable of acquiring associative strength independently of other elements. Configural models, on the other hand, assume that associative strength accrues to percepts as wholes. Here I derive a necessary and sufficient condition for an elemental and a configural model to be equivalent, i.e., to always make the same predictions. I then ask when the condition can be fulfilled. I show that it is always possible to construct a configural model equivalent to a given elemental model, provided we broaden somewhat the customary definition of a configural model. Constructing an elemental model equivalent to a given elemental one is possible provided the generalization function of the configural model is positive definite. The latter condition is satisfied by existing configural models. The arguments leading to these conclusions clarify the relationship between elemental and configural models, and show that both approaches have heuristic value for associative learning theory. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:联想学习的基本方法和配置方法在根本上是不同的,许多理论和经验工作致力于确定哪种方法可以更好地解释经验数据。元素模型假定每个感知元素都能够独立于其他元素而获得关联强度。另一方面,配置模型假定关联强度是整体感知力。在这里,我得出一个基本和配置模型相等的必要和充分条件,即始终做出相同的预测。然后我问何时可以满足条件。我表明,只要我们在某种程度上扩展了配置模型的常规定义,就始终可以构造与给定元素模型等效的配置模型。只要配置模型的泛化函数是正定的,就可以构造与给定基本模型等效的基本模型。后一种条件由现有的配置模型满足。得出这些结论的论点阐明了元素模型和配置模型之间的关系,并表明这两种方法对于联想学习理论都具有启发性的价值。 (C)2014 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号