首页> 外文期刊>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics: JMPT >Quantification of cavitation and gapping of lumbar zygapophyseal joints during spinal manipulative therapy
【24h】

Quantification of cavitation and gapping of lumbar zygapophyseal joints during spinal manipulative therapy

机译:脊椎手法治疗过程中腰椎phy突关节空化和间隙的量化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to use previously validated methods to quantify and relate 2 phenomena associated with chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (SMT): (1) cavitation and (2) the simultaneous gapping (separation) of the lumbar zygapophyseal (Z) joint spaces. Methods: This was a randomized, controlled, mechanistic clinical trial with blinding. Forty healthy participants (18-30 years old) without a history of low-back pain participated. Seven accelerometers were affixed to the skin overlying the spinous processes of L1 to L5 and the S1 and S2 sacral tubercles. Two additional accelerometers were positioned 3 cm left and right lateral to the L4/L5 interspinous space. Participants were randomized into group 1, side-posture SMT (n = 30), or group 2, side-posture positioning (SPP, n = 10). Cavitations were determined by accelerometer recordings during SMT and SPP (left side = upside for both groups); gapping (gapping difference) was determined by the difference between pre- and postintervention magnetic resonance imaging scan joint space measurements. Results of mean gapping differences were compared. Results: Upside SMT and SPP joints gapped more than downside joints (0.69 vs - 0.17 mm, P <.0001). Spinal manipulative therapy upside joints gapped more than SPP upside joints (0.75 vs 0.52 mm, P =.03). Spinal manipulative therapy upside joints gapped more in men than in women (1.01 vs 0.49 mm, P <.002). Overall, joints that cavitated gapped more than those that did not (0.56 vs 0.22 mm, P =.01). No relationship was found between the occurrence of cavitation and gapping with upside joints alone (P =.43). Conclusions: Zygapophyseal joints receiving chiropractic SMT gapped more than those receiving SPP alone; Z joints of men gapped more than those of women, and cavitation indicated that a joint had gapped but not how much a joint had gapped. ? 2012 National University of Health Sciences.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是使用先前验证的方法来量化和关联与脊椎推拿手法治疗(SMT)相关的2种现象:(1)空化和(2)腰椎ga突(Z)的同时裂开(分离)关节空间。方法:这是一项随机,对照,致盲的机制临床试验。 40名无下腰痛史的健康参与者(18至30岁)参加了比赛。七个加速度计固定在L1至L5棘突和S1和S2结节的皮肤上。在L4 / L5棘突间空间的左右3 cm处放置两个附加的加速度计。参与者被随机分为第1组,侧位姿势SMT(n = 30),或第2组,侧位姿势(SPP,n = 10)。空化是由SMT和SPP期间的加速度计记录确定的(两组的左侧=上侧);间隙(间隙差异)由干预前后磁共振成像扫描关节间隙测量之间的差异确定。比较了平均缺口差异的结果。结果:上侧SMT和SPP缝隙比下侧缝隙更大(0.69对-0.17 mm,P <.0001)。脊椎手法治疗上关节的间隙大于SPP上关节(0.75 vs 0.52 mm,P = .03)。男性的脊椎操纵疗法上缝间隙大于女性(1.01比0.49 mm,P <.002)。总体而言,空化的缝隙比没有空化的缝隙更大(0.56对0.22 mm,P = 0.01)。空化的发生与仅靠上关节的间隙之间没有关系(P = .43)。结论:脊椎按摩疗法的脊椎干s关节的间隙比单独接受SPP的多。男人的Z关节间隙比女人的多,而空化表明关节有间隙,但没有多少间隙。 ? 2012国立卫生科学大学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号