...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >An unconfined groundwater model of the Death Valley Regional Flow System and a comparison to its confined predecessor
【24h】

An unconfined groundwater model of the Death Valley Regional Flow System and a comparison to its confined predecessor

机译:死亡谷区域流量系统的无限制地下水模型及其受限前身的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The MODFLOW version of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Death Valley Regional Flow System (DVRFS) in California and Nevada is conceptually inaccurate in that it models an unconfined aquifer as a confined system and does not accurately simulate unconfined drawdown in transient pumping simulations. The transfer of geologic and hydrologic information from the confined MODFLOW DVRFS model to an unconfined MCDFLOW-SURFACT (SURFACT) version was accomplished by maintaining cell structure between models and computing effective cell properties to translate the HUF2 package used in MODFLOW to the BCF4 package used by SURFACT. The confined version of the DVRFS was compared to the unconfined SURFACT version by examining head contour maps and the ability of the SURFACT model to match the 4900 observations of hydraulic head/drawdown, 49 observations of groundwater discharge, and 15 estimates of groundwater fluxes into/out of the model domain. Resultant weighted root mean squared error (omega RMSE) for the unconfined SURFACT model was lower than the USGS confined model. Despite a lower omega RMSE, unconfined conditions simulated with SURFACT did produce greater heads in mountainous regions compared to the confined MODFLOW with differences most pronounced in regions where cell thickness is large, horizontal conductivity small and recharge large. Difference in computed heads reflects computation schemes employed by both models to estimate interblock conductance. Specifically, interblock conductance for the unconfined SURFACT model is dependent on the relative saturation of a modeled cell while MODFLOW's confined system is not. Despite head differences, SURFACT simulates comparable flux estimates to MODFLOW (e.g. observed ET, groundwater spring flow, and groundwater flux across model boundaries), while significantly improving transient well drawdown estimates. SURFACT is also capable of producing more realistic estimates of water availability from proposed groundwater development and resultant potential impacts to the region.
机译:在加利福尼亚州和内华达州的美国地质调查局(USGS)死亡谷地区流量系统(DVRFS)的MODFLOW版本在概念上不准确,因为它将无限制含水层建模为受限系统,并且无法在瞬态抽水模拟中准确地模拟无限制汲水。将地质和水文信息从密闭的MODFLOW DVRFS模型转移到无限制的MCDFLOW-SURFACT(SURFACT)版本是通过维持模型之间的像元结构并计算有效像元属性以将MODFLOW中使用的HUF2包转换为MDFLOW使用的BCF4包来完成的表面。通过检查水头轮廓图和SURFACT模型与4900个水头/水位观测值,49个地下水排放量观测值以及15个估算的地下水通量/相匹配的能力,将DVRFS的受限版本与无限制SURFACT版本进行了比较。超出模型域。无约束SURFACT模型的结果加权均方根误差(ωRMSE)低于USGS约束模型。尽管欧米茄的RMSE较低,但与密闭MODFLOW相比,用SURFACT模拟的无限制条件的确在山区产生了更大的水头,在细胞厚度较大,水平电导率较小且补给较大的区域差异最为明显。计算头的差异反映了两个模型用来估计块间电导的计算方案。具体而言,无约束SURFACT模型的块间电导取决于建模单元的相对饱和度,而MODFLOW的约束系统则不受此影响。尽管存在水头差异,SURFACT可以模拟与MODFLOW相当的通量估算值(例如,观测到的ET,地下水泉水流量和跨模型边界的地下水通量),同时可以显着提高瞬态井水位估算值。 SURFACT还能够从拟议的地下水开发及其对该地区的潜在影响中得出更实际的可用水量估算。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号