...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >Development of neuro-fuzzy models to account for temporal and spatial variations in a lumped rainfall-runoff model
【24h】

Development of neuro-fuzzy models to account for temporal and spatial variations in a lumped rainfall-runoff model

机译:开发神经模糊模型以解决集中降雨径流模型中的时间和空间变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

For many good and practical reasons, lumped rainfall-runoff models are widely used to represent a catchment's response to rainfall. However, they have some acknowledged limitation, some of which are addressed here using a neuro-fuzzy model to combine, in an optimal way, a number of lumped-sub-models. For instance, to address temporal variation, one of the sub-models in the combination may perform well under flood conditions and another under drier conditions and the neuro-fuzzy system would combine their outputs for each time-step in a manner depending on the prevailing conditions. Similarly to address spatial, variation, one of the sub-models may perform well for the upland parts of the catchment and another for the lowland parts and again the neuro-fuzzy system is expected to combine the different outputs appropriately. The proposed combination method can use any Lumped catchment model, but has been tested here with the simple Linear model (SLM) and the soil moisture and accounting routing (SMAR) models. Eleven catchments with different hydrotogical and meteorological conditions have been used to assess the models with respect to temporal variations in response while one catchment is used to address the effect of spatial variation. The neuro-fuzzy combined-sub-models of SLM and SMAR modelled the temporal and spatial variation in catchment response better than the lumped version of each model. Also the SMAR model significantly outperformed the SLM either as a Lumped model or as a sub-model in any of the combinations. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:由于许多良好和实际的原因,集总降雨径流模型被广泛用来代表流域对降雨的响应。但是,它们有一些公认的局限性,在这里可以使用神经模糊模型以最佳方式组合多个集总子模型来解决其中的一些局限性。例如,为了解决时间变化,组合中的一个子模型在洪水条件下可能表现良好,而在干燥条件下的另一个子模型,神经模糊系统会根据当时的情况将每个时间步的输出进行组合条件。与解决空间变化类似,子模型中的一个对于集水区的高地部分可能表现良好,而对于低地部分的子模型则可能表现良好,并且神经模糊系统也有望适当地组合不同的输出。所提出的组合方法可以使用任何集总集水模型,但已在此处使用简单的线性模型(SLM)和土壤水分和计水路线(SMAR)模型进行了测试。已经使用了11个具有不同水文和气象条件的流域来评估有关响应的时间变化的模型,而使用一个流域来解决空间变化的影响。 SLM和SMAR的神经模糊组合子模型比每个模型的集总模型更好地模拟了集水区响应的时间和空间变化。而且,在任何组合中,SMAR模型无论是集总模型还是子模型,都大大优于SLM。 (C)2007 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号