首页> 外文期刊>Journal of health management >The Orthodoxy of Gender Mainstreaming: Reflecting on Gender Mainstreaming as a Strategy for Accomplishing the Millennium Development Goals
【24h】

The Orthodoxy of Gender Mainstreaming: Reflecting on Gender Mainstreaming as a Strategy for Accomplishing the Millennium Development Goals

机译:性别主流化的正统观念:反思性别主流化作为实现千年发展目标的战略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Gender mainstreaming has itself become something of a mainstream practice in much development work. As the theory and practice of mainstreaming has developed so too have a range of debates over what exactly gender mainstreaming can contribute to development. This article reflects on a gender mainstreaming intervention in the East African region to explore the role that gender mainstreaming can play in achieving the Millennium Development Goals. In this article we discuss how gender mainstreaming has, at times, functioned as a retreat from women's equality and is used to render feminist perspectives more palatable to those who resist them. Far from being a simple critique of gender mainstreaming this reflects the broader tensions and debates that are shaping what gender has come to mean in different contexts. This brings difficult tensions over who develops a gender mainstreaming agenda and who claims to have expertise on gender. We explore how much is at stake in claims to represent the 'beneficiary groups and the ways that donor relationships with NGOs function in this regard. Gender mainstreaming has clearly offered a mechanism for legitimating attention to gender inequality that is sufficiently flexible to account for local contexts. However, this flexibility also means that gender mainstreaming can be co-opted for conservative means and the struggles over ownership of gender mainstreaming can just as easily hamper the achievement of gender equality as envisaged in the MDGs.
机译:性别主流化本身已成为许多开发工作中的主流实践。随着主流化的理论和实践的发展,关于性别主流化究竟能为发展做出哪些贡献的辩论也越来越多。本文回顾了东非地区的性别主流化干预措施,以探讨性别主流化在实现千年发展目标中可以发挥的作用。在本文中,我们讨论了将性别观点纳入主流有时是如何使妇女平等退缩,并被用来使女权主义的观点对那些反抗者更为可口。这绝非简单地批评性别主流化,而是反映了广泛的紧张局势和辩论,这些问题和辩论正在塑造性别在不同背景下的含义。这给谁制定了将性别观点纳入主流议程以及谁声称拥有性别专门知识的问题带来了紧张的紧张局面。我们探索代表“受益人群体”的索赔有多大的利害关系,以及捐助者与非政府组织在这方面的作用方式。性别主流化显然已经提供了一种使对性别不平等的关注合法化的机制,该机制具有足够的灵活性以应对当地情况。但是,这种灵活性也意味着可以将性别主流化作为一种​​保守的手段,并且将性别主流化的所有权斗争也很容易像千年发展目标中所设想的那样阻碍实现性别平等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号