首页> 外文期刊>Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology >Indoor ultrafine particle exposures and home heating systems: a cross-sectional survey of Canadian homes during the winter months.
【24h】

Indoor ultrafine particle exposures and home heating systems: a cross-sectional survey of Canadian homes during the winter months.

机译:室内超细颗粒物暴露和家庭供暖系统:冬季对加拿大家庭的横断面调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Exposure to airborne particulate matter has a negative effect on respiratory health in both children and adults. Ultrafine particle (UFP) exposures are of particular concern owing to their enhanced ability to cause oxidative stress and inflammation in the lungs. In this investigation, our objective was to examine the contribution of home heating systems (electric baseboard heaters, wood stoves, forced-air oilatural gas furnace) to indoor UFP exposures. We conducted a cross-sectional survey in 36 homes in the cities of Montreal, Quebec, and Pembroke, Ontario. Real-time measures of indoor UFP concentrations were collected in each home for approximately 14 h, and an outdoor UFP measurement was collected outside each home before indoor sampling. A home-characteristic questionnaire was also administered, and air exchange rates were estimated using carbon dioxide as a tracer gas. Average UFP exposures of 21,594 cm(-3) (95% confidence interval (CI): 14,014, 29,174) and 6660 cm(-3) (95% CI: 4339, 8982) were observed for the evening (1600-2400) and overnight (2400-0800) hours, respectively. In an unadjusted comparison, overnight baseline UFP exposures were significantly greater in homes with electric baseboard heaters as compared to homes using forced-air oil or natural gas furnaces, and homes using wood stoves had significantly greater overnight baseline UFP exposures than homes using forced-air natural gas furnaces. However, in multivariate models, electric oven use (beta=12,253 cm(-3), 95% CI: 3524, 20,982), indoor relative humidity (beta=1136 cm(-3) %, 95% CI: 372, 1899), and indoor smoking (beta=18,192 cm(-3), 95% CI: 2073, 34,311) were the only significant determinants of mean indoor UFP exposure, whereas air exchange rate (beta=4351 cm(-3) h(-1), 95% CI: 1507, 7195) and each 10,000 cm(-3) increase in outdoor UFPs (beta=811 cm(-3), 95% CI: 244,1377) were the only significant determinants of overnight baseline UFP exposures. In general, our findings suggest that home heating systems are not important determinants of indoor UFP exposures.
机译:暴露于空气中的颗粒物会对儿童和成人的呼吸健康产生负面影响。由于超细颗粒(UFP)引起肺部氧化应激和炎症的能力增强,因此特别令人关注。在这项调查中,我们的目标是检验家用供暖系统(电踢脚线加热器,木灶,强制空气油/天然气炉)对室内UFP暴露的贡献。我们在蒙特利尔,魁北克和安大略省彭布罗克市的36所房屋中进行了横断面调查。在每个房屋中收集约14小时的室内UFP浓度的实时测量值,并在室内采样之前在每个房屋外收集室外UFP值。还进行了家庭特征问卷调查,并使用二氧化碳作为示踪气体估算了空气交换率。到了晚上(1600-2400),平均UFP暴露量为21,594 cm(-3)(95%置信区间(CI):14,014,29,174)和6660 cm(-3)(95%CI:4339,8982)分别隔夜(2400-0800)小时。在未经调整的比较中,与使用强制空气燃油或天然气炉的房屋相比,使用电动踢脚线加热器的房屋的夜间基准UFP暴露量显着大于使用强制空气的房屋的夜间基准UFP暴露量。天然气炉。但是,在多变量模型中,使用电烤箱(beta = 12,253 cm(-3),95%CI:3524,20,982),室内相对湿度(beta = 1136 cm(-3)%,95%CI:372,1899)和室内吸烟(beta = 18,192 cm(-3),95%CI:2073,34,311)是平均室内UFP暴露的唯一重要决定因素,而空气交换率(beta = 4351 cm(-3)h(-1) ),95%CI:1507、7195)和户外UFP每增加10,000 cm(-3)(beta = 811 cm(-3),95%CI:244,1377)是过夜基线UFP暴露的唯一重要决定因素。通常,我们的发现表明,家庭供暖系统不是室内UFP暴露的重要决定因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号