【24h】

Performance of PARI eFlow~R

机译:PARI eFlow〜R的性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I am somewhat disturbed by the methodology in the recent publication by Rottier et al. discussing the performance of the PARI eFlow Rapid and the PARI LC Plus. For example, they used laser diffraction with the Fraunhofer theory for particle sizing and found the differences between their results and other previously published results "cannot be explained easily." I would beg to differ. The Fraunhofer theory is very appropriate for opaque particles such as coal dust but not for transparent spheres or droplets. Joylon Mitchell, in his extensive (as one would expect from Jolyon) and excellent review of laser diffraction particle sizing/ points out that the correct theory for transparent spheres is the Mie theory. If Rottier and colleagues recalculate their data using the Mie theory, I am fairly certain that they will find similar results for MMD as have been found by others.
机译:Rottier等人在最近的出版物中对方法学感到不安。讨论PARI eFlow Rapid和PARI LC Plus的性能。例如,他们将激光衍射与弗劳恩霍夫(Fraunhofer)理论结合使用来确定颗粒大小,并发现其结果与先前发表的其他结果之间的差异“无法轻易解释”。我希望有所不同。弗劳恩霍夫理论非常适用于不透明的颗粒,例如煤尘,但不适用于透明的球体或液滴。乔伦·米切尔(Joylon Mitchell)在其广泛的著作(正如乔林(Jolyon)所期望的那样)中,对激光衍射粒子的尺寸进行了出色的综述,并指出透明球的正确理论是米氏理论。如果Rottier及其同事使用Mie理论重新计算其数据,我可以肯定的是,他们将为MMD找到与其他人相似的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号