...
【24h】

Response

机译:响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Mathioudakis A et al. discussed an increased risk of mortality in Respimat compared to HandiHaler. Our recent article by Asakura Y et al. showed only the short-term usefulness and safety of Respimat in a small population study. Certainly, long-term safety, especially the difference in mortality between devices, is an important problem to be solved. Singh S et al. first showed the possibility of an increased risk of mortality in Respimat compared to HandiHaler by meta-analysis. However, this meta-analysis is constructed from limited data from published articles. It is not the final opinion that Respimat increases mortality compared to HandiHaler in the patients with COPD. The difference of mortality between tiotropium devices should be explained by a large multicenter study, which is ongoing now. Of course, discussion about the differences in mortality between HandiHaler and Respimat is welcome. However, I think the opinion about an increased mortality in Respimat should be more carefully and not definitively discussed.
机译:Mathioudakis A等。讨论了与HandiHaler相比,Respimat死亡率增加的风险。我们最近发表的Asakura Y等人的文章。在少量人群研究中,仅显示了Respimat的短期有用性和安全性。当然,长期安全性,尤其是设备之间的死亡率差异,是需要解决的重要问题。 Singh S等。首先通过荟萃分析显示,与HandiHaler相比,Respimat的死亡率可能增加。但是,这种荟萃分析是根据已发表文章的有限数据构建的。与HandiHaler相比,Respimat可增加COPD患者的死亡率,这并不是最终结论。噻托溴铵装置之间的死亡率差异应通过一项正在进行的大型多中心研究来解释。当然,欢迎就HandiHaler和Respimat之间的死亡率差异进行讨论。但是,我认为关于Respimat死亡率增加的观点应该更加谨慎,而不应进行明确讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号