首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy.
【24h】

Minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy.

机译:微创vs根治性前列腺切除术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To the Editor: The rapid uptake of robotic radical prostatectomy has occurred despite minimal evidence of its superiority to the open approach. In the absence of a large randomized clinical trial comparing techniques, information regarding outcomes of these procedures is limited to observational studies, including those based on administrative data. Using population-based cancer registry data linked with Medicare claims, Dr Hu and colleagues reported greater rates of incontinence and erectile dysfunction with minimally invasive radical prostatectomy compared with open radical retropubic prostatectomy in men with prostate cancer.
机译:致编辑:尽管几乎没有证据显示机器人根治性前列腺切除术优于开放式方法,但仍迅速吸收了机器人根治性前列腺切除术。在缺乏大型随机临床试验比较技术的情况下,有关这些程序结果的信息仅限于观察性研究,包括基于行政数据的研究。胡博士及其同事使用与Medicare索赔相关的基于人群的癌症登记数据,报道与男性前列腺癌相比,微创根治性前列腺切除术与开阔性耻骨后前列腺切除术相比,失禁和勃起功能障碍的发生率更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号