首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Pharmacological treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia: a review of the evidence.
【24h】

Pharmacological treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia: a review of the evidence.

机译:痴呆症的神经精神症状的药理治疗:证据复习。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: Neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia are common and associated with poor outcomes for patients and caregivers. Although nonpharmacological interventions should be the first line of treatment, a wide variety of pharmacological agents are used in the management of neuropsychiatric symptoms; therefore, concise, current, evidence-based recommendations are needed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of pharmacological agents used in the treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review of English-language articles published from 1966 to July 2004 using MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and a manual search of bibliographies was conducted. Inclusion criteria were double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or meta-analyses of any drug therapy for patients with dementia that included neuropsychiatric outcomes. Trials reporting only depression outcomes were excluded. Data on the inclusion criteria, patients, methods, results, and quality of each study were independently abstracted. Twenty-nine articles met inclusion criteria. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: For typical antipsychotics, 2 meta-analyses and 2 RCTs were included. Generally, no difference among specific agents was found, efficacy was small at best, and adverse effects were common. Six RCTs with atypical antipsychotics were included; results showed modest, statistically significant efficacy of olanzapine and risperidone, with minimal adverse effects at lower doses. Atypical antipsychotics are associated with an increased risk of stroke. There have been no RCTs designed to directly compare the efficacy of typical and atypical antipsychotics. Five trials of antidepressants were included; results showed no efficacy for treating neuropsychiatric symptoms other than depression, with the exception of 1 study of citalopram. For mood stabilizers, 3 RCTs investigating valproate showed no efficacy. Two small RCTs of carbamazepine had conflicting results. Two meta-analyses and 6 RCTs of cholinesterase inhibitors generally showed small, although statistically significant, efficacy. Two RCTs of memantine also had conflicting results for treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacological therapies are not particularly effective for management of neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia. Of the agents reviewed, the atypical antipsychotics risperidone and olanzapine currently have the best evidence for efficacy. However, the effects are modest and further complicated by an increased risk of stroke. Additional trials of cholinesterase inhibitors enrolling patients with high levels of neuropsychiatric symptoms may be warranted.
机译:背景:痴呆症的神经精神症状很常见,并且对患者和护理人员的预后不良。尽管非药物干预应该是治疗的第一线,但神经精神症状的治疗仍使用了多种药物。因此,需要简洁,最新,基于证据的建议。目的:评价药物治疗痴呆症的神经精神症状的疗效。证据获取:使用MEDLINE,Cochrane系统评价数据库以及对书目的手动搜索,对1966年至2004年7月出版的英语文章进行了系统的回顾。纳入标准为双盲,安慰剂对照,随机对照试验(RCT)或对包括神经精神疾病预后的痴呆患者进行任何药物治疗的荟萃分析。仅报告抑郁结果的试验被排除。单独提取关于纳入标准,患者,方法,结果和每项研究质量的数据。符合纳入标准的文章有29篇。证据综合:对于典型的抗精神病药物,包括2项荟萃分析和2项RCT。通常,没有发现特异性药物之间的差异,疗效充其量是小的,并且不良反应是常见的。包括六种非典型抗精神病药物的随机对照试验;结果显示,奥氮平和利培酮具有中度的,统计学上显着的疗效,并且在较低剂量下不良反应最小。非典型抗精神病药与中风风险增加相关。尚无旨在直接比较典型和非典型抗精神病药疗效的RCT。包括五项抗抑郁药试验;除一项西酞普兰研究外,结果显示除抑郁症外,无其他疗法可治疗神经精神症状。对于情绪稳定剂,研究丙戊酸盐的3个RCT没有显示疗效。卡马西平的两个小型RCT结果相互矛盾。胆碱酯酶抑制剂的两次荟萃分析和6个RCT通常显示出很小的疗效,尽管在统计学上很显着。美金刚的两个RCT在神经精神症状的治疗上也有矛盾的结果。结论:药理疗法对痴呆症的神经精神症状的管理不是特别有效。在所审查的药物中,非典型抗精神病药利培酮和奥氮平目前具有最佳疗效证据。然而,由于中风的风险增加,这种影响不大,而且更加复杂。可能需要对胆碱酯酶抑制剂进行更多试验,使神经精神症状高水平的患者入组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号