...
首页> 外文期刊>Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries >Patient Safety and Reprocessing: A Usability Test of the Endoscope Reprocessing Procedure
【24h】

Patient Safety and Reprocessing: A Usability Test of the Endoscope Reprocessing Procedure

机译:患者安全与后处理:内窥镜后处理程序的可用性测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

When endoscopes are reprocessed correctly, endoscopy is a safe procedure. Recent incidents of insufficient reprocessing, however, have resulted in public concern. Results of a usability test of the reprocessing procedure identified that none of 24 users, naive to the procedure, could reprocess endoscopes correctly, nor could they correctly complete any of the component tasks in the procedure. Five of the 76 subtasks were identified as particularly critical. These were 1) brushing the instrument channel, 2) attaching the channel plug and injection tube, 3) identifying leaks, 4) blowing water out of the endoscope's internal channels during high-level disinfection, and 5) aspirating solution through the endoscope to remove debris loosened by brushing. Additionally, three themes were identified as causes of the majority of problems: 1) lack of visibility, 2) high memory demands, and 3) insufficient user feedback. Design recommendations for these problems are discussed.
机译:正确地处理内窥镜后,内窥镜检查是安全的。但是,最近的后处理不足事件引起了公众的关注。重新处理过程的可用性测试结果表明,天真的该过程的24位用户中没有一个可以正确地对内窥镜进行重新处理,也不能正确地完成该过程中的任何组件任务。 76个子任务中有5个被确定为特别关键。这些步骤包括:1)刷洗仪器通道,2)连接通道塞和进样管,3)识别泄漏,4)在高水平消毒期间将水从内窥镜内部通道中吹出,5)通过内窥镜抽吸溶液以去除内窥镜刷牙清除碎屑。此外,三个主题被确定为导致大多数问题的原因:1)缺乏可见性; 2)内存需求高; 3)用户反馈不足。讨论了针对这些问题的设计建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号