首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of pharmacy practice >Direct-to-consumer advertising: Australian pharmacists' experiences with non-prescription medicines.
【24h】

Direct-to-consumer advertising: Australian pharmacists' experiences with non-prescription medicines.

机译:直接面向消费者的广告:澳大利亚药剂师在非处方药方面的经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) of over-the-counter or prescribed medicines is a highly controversial issue relating to public health care. Advocates highlight the advantages of DTCA in terms of patient awareness and autonomy. Opponents voice concerns about safety and patients' best interests. The views of physicians and consumers about DTCA have been widely investigated. There has been little research, however, in relation to pharmacists' experiences with DTCA and the impact of DTCA on pharmacy practice. The aim of this study was therefore to explore pharmacists' perceptions of DTCA in Australia and its impact on pharmacy practice. METHODS: A semi-structured in-depth interview was conducted with a purposive convenience sample of retail pharmacists in Sydney, Australia. Interviews were recorded, transcribed ad verbatim and continued until data saturation. Emerging themes were extracted and analysed according to the grounded theory approach. KEY FINDINGS: Pharmacists participating in this study reported concern about potential harm to patient health and well-being as a result of the influence of DTCA. DTCA was seen to impede pharmacists in the discharge of their fundamental ethical responsibilities, leading to a strong sense of disempowerment. Pharmacists' gate-keeping role was challenged by DTCA encouraging consumers to self-medicate and inducing a range of drug-seeking behaviours. Although pharmacists acknowledged that DTCA may have a role in promoting patient autonomy, in practice DTCA compromised their role in safeguarding consumers from inappropriate use of medicines. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted that the impact of DTCA is not restricted to prescription medicines, but extended also to over-the-counter, pharmacist-only and other pharmacy-related products. Pharmacists perceived that DTCA disempowered them, compromising their role in safeguarding the community from inappropriate medicine use.
机译:目的:非处方药或处方药的直接面向消费者的广告(DTCA)是与公共卫生保健有关的备受争议的问题。倡导者强调了DTCA在患者意识和自主性方面的优势。反对者表达了对安全性和患者最大利益的担忧。医师和消费者对DTCA的观点已被广泛研究。但是,关于药剂师在DTCA方面的经验以及DTCA对药学实践的影响,研究很少。因此,本研究的目的是探讨澳大利亚的药剂师对DTCA的看法及其对药房实践的影响。方法:采用有目的的便利样本,在澳大利亚悉尼的零售药剂师中进行了半结构化深度访谈。记录访谈,逐字记录,直到数据饱和为止。根据扎根的理论方法提取和分析新兴主题。主要发现:参与该研究的药剂师报告称,由于DTCA的影响,对患者健康和福祉的潜在危害令人担忧。人们认为DTCA会阻碍药剂师履行其基本的道德责任,从而导致强烈的丧失权力的感觉。 DTCA鼓励药剂师自用药并诱导一系列寻求药物的行为,从而挑战了药剂师的守门职责。尽管药剂师承认DTCA可能在促进患者自主性方面发挥作用,但实际上DTCA在保护消费者免受药物不当使用方面的作用受到损害。结论:这项研究强调了DTCA的影响不仅限于处方药,还扩展到了非处方药,仅药剂师和其他与药房有关的产品。药剂师认为DTCA剥夺了他们的权力,损害了他们在保护社区免受不适当药物使用的影响。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号