首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >EVALUATION OF THE SWAT MODEL'S HYDROLOGY COMPONENT IN THE PIEDMONT PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGION OF MARYLAND
【24h】

EVALUATION OF THE SWAT MODEL'S HYDROLOGY COMPONENT IN THE PIEDMONT PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGION OF MARYLAND

机译:马里兰州皮德蒙自然地理区特警模型的水文分量评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Continuous water quality monitoring is expensive and spatially impractical in mixed land use watersheds. Mathematical watershed-scale models are among the best tools available for analyzing water resources (quantity and quality) issues in spatially diverse watersheds. Although existing watershed-scale models provide some reasonable guidelines, their application without proper validation has resulted in some misconceptions about such models. This study used six years of hydrologic data to calibrate and validate the capability of the SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model in predicting surface and subsurface flow for a 340 ha watershed in the Piedmont physiographic region of Maryland. Previous studies have indicated that most existing models only handle subsurface flow bounded by the surface topography, thus neglecting the possible subsurface flow contribution from the outside of watershed, which appears to be a great model deficiency considering the major pathway of pollutant loadings via subsurface flow. Preliminary simulations showed that SWAT underestimated subsurface flow and total streamflow, especially during wet periods. A water budget analysis, therefore, was performed to quantify various components of the hydrologic cycle within the watershed. The resulting imbalance in water budget analysis suggested a considerable groundwater contribution from outside the watershed, especially during wet years. Adjustments to measured base flow and streamflow were made to exclude the extra groundwater recharge from outside the watershed, thus comparing the model predictions with appropriate measured data. However, SWAT seemed to be unable to simulate the extremely wet hydrologic conditions, even after adjustments to measured data. Overall, the hydrology component of the SWAT model is able to perform an acceptable prediction of long-term simulations for management purposes, but fails to have reasonable predictions for short time intervals (i.e., daily).
机译:持续的水质监测成本高昂,在混合土地利用流域中在空间上不切实际。数学分水岭规模模型是可用于分析空间不同流域中的水资源(数量和质量)问题的最佳工具。尽管现有的分水岭规模模型提供了一些合理的指导原则,但是在未经适当验证的情况下应用它们会导致对此类模型的误解。这项研究使用了6年的水文数据来校准和验证SWAT(土壤和水评估工具)模型预测马里兰州皮埃蒙特自然地理区340公顷流域地表和地下流量的能力。先前的研究表明,大多数现有模型仅处理受表面地形限制的地下流,因此忽略了流域外部可能产生的地下流,考虑到污染物通过地下流的主要传播途径,这似乎是一个巨大的模型缺陷。初步模拟显示,特警队低估了地下流量和总流量,特别是在湿润时期。因此,进行了水预算分析以量化流域内水文循环的各个组成部分。由此造成的水预算分析失衡表明,流域外部的地下水贡献很大,尤其是在雨季。调整了测得的基本流量和水流量,以排除流域外部多余的地下水补给,因此将模型预测与适当的测得数据进行了比较。但是,即使调整了测量数据,特警队似乎也无法模拟极端潮湿的水文条件。总体而言,SWAT模型的水文学部分能够为管理目的对长期模拟进行可接受的预测,但无法在短时间间隔(即每天)中进行合理的预测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号