...
首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >EMISSION FACTORS FOR FIRST- AND SECOND-PICK PIMA COTTON
【24h】

EMISSION FACTORS FOR FIRST- AND SECOND-PICK PIMA COTTON

机译:第一匹和第二匹PIMA棉的排放因子

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

EPA's Region 9, which includes the major Pima production areas of California and Arizona, raised the concern of possible emission factor differences between first- and second-pick Pima cotton. Anecdotal evidence indicated that some complaints of excessive paniculate emissions from Pima gins have arisen from the processing of second-pick cotton. A large amount of emission factor information has been developed over the past 20 years for cotton gins. While some of these data probably include some second-pick upland cotton, most of the upland cotton is harvested once-over with no second picking. There have also been emission factor data gathered for Pima gins, but none of these data can be verifiably attributed to second-pick Pima cotton. Due to the market value of the Pima fiber, there is a significant amount of second-pick Pima cotton ginned each year in EPA Region 9. A study was conducted at a commercial roller gin during the 2001 ginning season to determine what differences there were, if any, between the emission factors for first- and second-pick Pima cotton. Source testing was conducted on the first seed-cotton cleaning and drying system, which is one of the heaviest in terms of paniculate emissions. This replicated source test showed that all measured emission parameters were lower for second-pick Pima cotton. This result indicates that there is no need for separate paniculate emission factors for first- and second-pick Pima. This test also indicates that emissions determined by current EPA-approved source sampling methods may be overestimating emission levels by as much as 1.5 times. A final result is that the levels of PM{sub}2.5 (particles whose diameter is less than or equal to 2.5 μm) are less than 0.5% of the total emissions for either first- or second-pick Pima.
机译:EPA的9区(包括加利福尼亚和亚利桑那州的主要皮马生产地区)引起了人们的关注,即第一匹和第二匹皮马棉之间的排放因子可能存在差异。轶事证据表明,对第二批棉花的加工引起了一些对皮马轧花机出粉的过度抱怨的投诉。在过去的20年中,已经为轧棉机开发了大量的排放因子信息。虽然其中一些数据可能包括一些第二季陆地棉,但大多数陆地棉只收获一次,而没有第二次采摘。也已经收集了皮马杜松子酒的排放因子数据,但是这些数据都不能被证实归因于第二批皮马棉。由于Pima纤维的市场价值,在EPA地区9中每年都有大量的第二毛Pima棉轧花。在2001年轧花季节期间,对商用轧辊轧花进行了一项研究,以确定有哪些差异,如果有的话,在第一匹和第二匹皮马棉的排放因子之间。源测试是在第一个籽棉清洁和干燥系统上进行的,该系统是颗粒排放最重的系统之一。这项重复的源测试表明,第二匹皮马棉的所有测得的排放参数均较低。该结果表明,对于第一批和第二批Pima,不需要单独的颗粒排放因子。该测试还表明,由目前的EPA批准的源采样方法确定的排放量可能高估了排放量1.5倍。最终结果是,对于第一批或第二批Pima,PM {sub} 2.5(直径小于或等于2.5μm的颗粒)的水平小于总排放量的0.5%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号