首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BORDER IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
【24h】

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BORDER IRRIGATION SYSTEMS

机译:边界灌溉系统的分析与设计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Application efficiency (E{sub}a) is the primary criterion for border irrigation design and management. The objective of this study is to analyze the behavior of the application efficiency function of border irrigation with respect to border length (L) and unit inlet flow rate (q{sub}o), given a target minimum application depth. The results show that the application efficiency Junction is unimodal with respect to L and q{sub}o. Optimality conditions are derived for both the E{sub}a(L) and E{sub}a(q{sub}o) functions, based on which simple rules that reduce the design and management procedure into a series of one-dimensional optimization problems with respect to q{sub}o are developed. The proposed procedure has a variable bounding step in which the feasible ranges of L and q{sub}o are determined. This is then followed by a step wherein alternative approximate optimum values of E{sub}a(q{sub}o) are calculated for each of the feasible values of L. Finally, the optimal E{sub}a(q{sub}o) is selected from the available alternatives based on sensitivity analysis and other locally pertinent practical criteria. In addition, the advantages and limitations of advance-phase and post-advance-phase inflow cutoff options and their effects on system design and management are discussed. The distance-based (advance-phase) inflow cutoff option offers two main advantages over post-advance-phase cutoff: operational convenience, and a lower degree of sensitivity of design and management prescriptions to inaccuracies in inflow measurements and to non-uniformities in the distribution of inlet flow over the width of the border. However, the results of the study also show that, depending on the parameter set, there exist limiting conditions that preclude the applicability of the distance-based cutoff criterion in border irrigation management. Even when the distance-based inflow cutoff criterion is feasible, the corresponding design and management scenario can be sub-optimal, in which case a near-optimum operation scenario can be realized only with post-advance-phase inflow cutoff.
机译:施用效率(E {sub} a)是边界灌溉设计和管理的主要标准。这项研究的目的是分析边界灌溉的施用效率函数相对于边界长度(L)和单位进口流量(q {sub} o)的行为,并给出目标最小施用深度。结果表明,对于L和q {sub} o,应用效率Junction是单峰的。为E {sub} a(L)和E {sub} a(q {sub} o)函数得出最优条件,基于这些条件,将设计和管理过程简化为一系列一维优化的简单规则关于q {sub} o的问题已经出现。所提出的过程具有可变边界步骤,其中确定了L和q {sub} o的可行范围。然后接着是一个步骤,其中为L的每个可行值计算E {sub} a(q {sub} o)的替代近似最佳值。最后,最优E {sub} a(q {sub} o)是根据敏感性分析和其他与当地相关的实际标准从可用替代方法中选择的。此外,还讨论了进阶阶段和进阶阶段的流入截止选项的优点和局限性及其对系统设计和管理的影响。基于距离的(提前阶段)入流截止选项与提前阶段后的截止相比具有两个主要优点:操作方便,设计和管理处方对流入量测量的不准确性以及对流量不均匀性的敏感性较低。入口流量在边界宽度上的分布。但是,研究结果还表明,取决于参数集,存在限制条件,无法使用基于距离的截止标准在边界灌溉管理中适用。即使当基于距离的流入截止标准可行时,相应的设计和管理方案也可能是次优的,在这种情况下,只有提前阶段后的流入截止才能实现接近最佳的运行方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号