首页> 外文期刊>The American journal of bioethics: AJOB >The Instrumental Role of Hospital Ethics Committees in Policy Work
【24h】

The Instrumental Role of Hospital Ethics Committees in Policy Work

机译:医院伦理委员会在政策工作中的工具作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The traditional trinity of hospital ethics committees comprise of an ethics consult service, policy development, and education. Many of these activities take place behind closed doors, prompting Frolic and colleagues to open this "black box" of ethics policy work of multidisciplinary hospital or healthcare ethics committees (HECs) (Frolic et al. 2012). The authors draw attention to the fact that there is very little empirical work or literature on the policy work of healthcare ethics committees, yet plenty of data exists on case consultations. Despite the fact that FIECs spend 23% of their time formulating or evaluating policy (McGee et al. 2001), we know relatively little about how this process unfolds at different medical institutions. Frolic and colleagues (2012) document real-time deliberations and subsequent changes and improvements to their developing policy review processes.
机译:医院伦理委员会的传统三位一体包括伦理咨询服务,政策制定和教育。其中许多活动都是秘密进行的,这促使Frolic及其同事打开了多学科医院或医疗伦理委员会(HECs)的伦理政策工作的“黑匣子”(Frolic等,2012)。作者提请注意这样一个事实,即关于医疗保健伦理委员会的政策工作的实证研究或文献很少,但是有关案例咨询的数据却很多。尽管FIEC花费了23%的时间来制定或评估政策(McGee等,2001),但我们对这一过程在不同医疗机构中如何开展的了解相对较少。 Frolic及其同事(2012年)记录了实时审议以及对他们制定的政策审核流程的后续更改和改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号