...
首页> 外文期刊>The journals of gerontology.Series A. Biological sciences and medical sciences >A randomized study of a multidisciplinary program to intervene on geriatric syndromes in vulnerable older people who live at home (Dutch EASYcare Study).
【24h】

A randomized study of a multidisciplinary program to intervene on geriatric syndromes in vulnerable older people who live at home (Dutch EASYcare Study).

机译:一项多学科计划的随机研究,旨在干预在家中生活脆弱的老年人中的老年综合症(荷兰EASYcare研究)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of community-based geriatric intervention models for vulnerable older adults is controversial. We evaluated a problem-based multidisciplinary intervention targeting vulnerable older adults at home that promised efficacy through better timing and increased commitment of patients and primary care physicians. This study compared the effects of this new model to usual care. METHODS: Primary care physicians referred older people for problems with cognition, nutrition, behavior, mood, or mobility. One hundred fifty-one participants (mean age 82.2 years, 74.8% women) were included in a pseudocluster randomized trial with 6-month follow-up for the primary outcomes. Eighty-five participants received the new intervention, and 66 usual care. In the intervention arm, geriatric nurses visited patients at home for geriatric assessment and management in cooperation with primary care physicians and geriatricians. Modified intention-to-treat analyses focused on differences between treatment arms in functional abilities (Groningen Activity Restriction Scale-3) and mental well-being (subscale mental health Medical Outcomes Study [MOS]-20), using a mixed linear model. RESULTS: After 3 months, treatment arms showed significant differences in favor of the new intervention. Functional abilities improved 2.2 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-4.2) and well-being 5.8 points (95% CI, 0.1-11.4). After 6 months, the favorable effect increased for well-being (9.1; 95% CI, 2.4-15.9), but the effect on functional abilities was no longer significant (1.6; 95% CI, -0.7 to 3.9). CONCLUSIONS: This problem-based geriatric intervention improved functional abilities and mental well-being of vulnerable older people. Problem-based interventions can increase the effectiveness of primary care for this population.
机译:背景:针对弱势老年人的社区老年医学干预模型的有效性存在争议。我们评估了针对问题的基于多学科的干预措施,针对在家中的弱势老年人,该干预措施通过更好的时机并增加了患者和初级保健医生的承诺,有望保证疗效。这项研究比较了这种新模型与常规护理的效果。方法:基层医疗医生转介了老年人的认知,营养,行为,情绪或活动性问题。一百一十一名参与者(平均年龄82.2岁,女性74.8%)被纳入了一项伪集群随机试验,对主要结局进行了6个月的随访。 85名参与者接受了新的干预措施,并接受了66次常规护理。在干预部门,老年护士与初级保健医生和老年医生合作,在家中拜访患者进行老年评估和管理。修改后的意向性治疗分析使用混合线性模型,着眼于治疗组在功能能力(格罗宁根活动限制量表-3)和心理健康(心理健康医学结果研究[MOS] -20)上的差异。结果:3个月后,治疗组显示出明显的差异,支持新的干预措施。功能能力提高了2.2点(95%置信区间[CI],0.3-4.2)和幸福感5.8点(95%CI,0.1-11.4)。 6个月后,对幸福感的有利影响增加(9.1; 95%CI,2.4-15.9),但对功能能力的影响不再显着(1.6; 95%CI,-0.7至3.9)。结论:基于问题的老年医学干预措施改善了弱势老年人的功能能力和心理健康。基于问题的干预措施可以提高该人群的初级保健效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号