...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry >Annual review of selected dental literature: report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry.
【24h】

Annual review of selected dental literature: report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry.

机译:某些牙科文献的年度回顾:美国修复牙科学院科学调查委员会的报告。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This review of current dental literature published in 2005 summarizes articles selected on the basis of new information or important confirmatory results that contribute to the advance of dentistry. In addition to the summary presented, there are comments on the relative strength of the evidence presented in the published reports cited. The quality and validity of the current dental literature is widely variable and often misleading or inaccurate. Careful interpretation of scientific information remains both a requirement and a formidable task for the practicing dentist in order to stay current and provide state-of-the-art dental care.Evidence-based research methods introduce objective, nonbiased studies as a scientific foundation for treatment decisions and choices of materials and techniques . The highest order of scientific evidence for treatment effectiveness is the randomized, controlled clinical trial, which is blinded and longitudinal. Next in order of importance are cohort or longitudinal studies, case-controlled studies, noncontrolled case studies, descriptive studies, and animal or laboratory studies. The primary goal of this review is to aid the practicing dentist in critically analyzing the current literature and in recognizing the hierarchy of evidence. This scientific approach is especially necessary today, as new products and techniques are promoted during lectures and through advertising media that have had neither sufficient time in use nor any valid scientific evaluation.
机译:这项对2005年出版的最新牙科文献的综述总结了根据有助于牙科发展的新信息或重要的验证性结果而选择的文章。除了提供的摘要外,还对所引用的已发表报告中提供的证据的相对强度进行了评论。当前牙科文献的质量和有效性差异很大,并且常常会引起误解或不准确。为了保持最新状态并提供最新的牙科护理,认真理解科学信息仍然是执业牙医的要求和艰巨任务。循证研究方法引入客观,无偏见的研究作为治疗的科学基础材料和技术的决定和选择。治疗效果的最高科学证据是随机,对照的临床试验,该试验是盲目的和纵向的。接下来是重要性研究,即队列研究或纵向研究,病例对照研究,非对照病例研究,描述性研究以及动物或实验室研究。这篇综述的主要目的是帮助执业牙医进行批判性地分析最新文献并认识证据层次。今天,这种科学方法尤为必要,因为在演讲过程中以及通过既没有足够的使用时间也没有任何有效的科学评估的广告媒体来推广新产品和技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号