...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of legal medicine >Electronic fetal monitoring: A bridge too far
【24h】

Electronic fetal monitoring: A bridge too far

机译:电子胎儿监护:距离太远的桥梁

获取原文
           

摘要

The most common obstetrical procedure in the United States is electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) during labor. Approximately 85% of the 4,000,000 annual births are EFM monitored. EFM is the standard of care in virtually every community. Hospitals have invested multiple millions of dollars in electronic fetal monitoring since its acceptance into clinical practice in the late 1960s. Hospitals and physicians have billed and been paid many millions of dollars for EFM use. Despite its ubiquity and acceptance in daily clinical obstetrical practice, there are and always have been some important, esoteric EFM secrets: its scientific foundation is feeble; inter-observer/intra-observer reliability is poor
机译:在美国,最常见的产科程序是分娩时的电子胎儿监护(EFM)。在每年4,000,000例出生中,约有85%受EFM监控。 EFM是几乎每个社区的护理标准。自从1960年代末开始接受电子胎儿监护以来,医院已经在电子胎儿监护上投入了数百万美元。医院和医生已为EFM使用付费并支付了数百万美元。尽管它在日常的临床产科实践中无处不在并被接受,但仍然存在并且始终存在着一些重要的,深奥的EFM秘密:其科学基础薄弱;观察者间/观察者内可靠性差

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号