【24h】

How to protect general practice from child protection.

机译:如何保护一般做法免受儿童保护。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The tragic deaths of Victoria Climbie and Peter Connelly (Baby P) and the ensuing moral panics have driven the world of child protection into a spiral of defensiveness, posturing, and bureaucratic box-ticking that is now threatening to engulf general practice — to the detriment of both doctors and any children who might need safeguarding. Over the past month I have received requests from local child protection authorities for reports on 18 children. These follow a standard form, opening with a request for 'specific medical history' and proceeding to solicit further information under a number of headings: the 'developmental needs of the child' (with five subheadings); the 'capacities of parent/carer to respond appropriately to those needs' (six categories); the 'impact of family and environmental factors on parenting capacity and the child' (six categories); and, finally, 'any other relevant information'.
机译:维多利亚·克林比(Peter C.医生和任何可能需要保护的孩子。在过去的一个月中,我收到了当地儿童保护部门的要求,要求提供18名儿童的报告。这些遵循标准表格,首先要求提供“特定病史”,然后在以下几个标题下寻求进一步的信息:“儿童的发展需求”(五个子标题); “父母/照顾者对这些需求做出适当反应的能力”(六类); “家庭和环境因素对育儿能力和孩子的影响”(六类);最后是“任何其他相关信息”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号