首页> 外文期刊>The American surgeon. >Operative experience in the era of duty hour restrictions: is broad-based general surgery training coming to an end?
【24h】

Operative experience in the era of duty hour restrictions: is broad-based general surgery training coming to an end?

机译:上班时间限制时代的手术经验:基础广泛的普通外科手术培训即将结束吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Since the institution of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) resident work hour restrictions, conflicting evidence exists regarding the impact on resident case volume with most data from single-institution studies. We examined the effect of restrictions on national resident operative experience. After permission from the ACGME, we reviewed the publicly available national resident case log data (1999 through 2008) maintained on the ACGME web site (www.acgme.org), including total major cases with subanalysis of the ACGME-specified categories. The mean cases per resident were compared before (1999 to 2003) and after (2003 to 2008) restrictions. After the implementation of duty hour restrictions, the mean number of total cases per resident significantly decreased (949 +/- 18 vs 911 +/- 14, P = 0.004). Subanalysis showed a significant increase in alimentary tract (217 +/- 7 vs 229 +/- 3, P = 0.004), skin/soft tissue (31 +/- 3 vs 36 +/- 1, P = 0.01), and endocrine (26 +/- 2 vs 31 +/- 2, P = 0.006) cases. However, we observed a significant decrease in head and neck (21 +/- 0.3 vs 20 +/- 0.3, P = 0.01), vascular (164 +/- 29 vs 126 +/- 5, P = 0.01), pediatric (41 +/- 1 vs 37 +/- 2, P = 0.006), genitourinary (10 +/- 2 vs 7 +/- 1, P = 0.004), gynecologic surgery (5 +/- 1 vs 3 +/- 0.6, P = 0.002), plastics (16 +/- 0.3 vs 15 +/- 0.7, P = 0.03), and endoscopy (91 +/- 3 vs 82 +/- 2, P < 0.001) procedures. Analysis of the ACGME-compiled national data confirms that duty hour restrictions have significantly impacted resident operative experience. Importantly, experience in specialty areas, including vascular and endoscopy, appears to have been sacrificed for consolidation of resources into general surgery services as indicated by the increase in alimentary tract and endocrine cases. These findings raise the following question: Is the era of truly broad-based general surgery training coming to an end?
机译:由于研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)的居民工作时间受到限制,因此有关单机构研究的大多数数据对居民病例数量的影响存在矛盾的证据。我们研究了限制对本国居民操作经验的影响。在获得ACGME许可后,我们审查了保存在ACGME网站(www.acgme.org)上的可公开获得的全国居民病例日志数据(1999年至2008年),包括对ACGME指定类别进行子分析的全部重大病例。在限制之前(1999年至2003年)和限制后(2003年至2008年)比较了每个居民的平均病例。在实施工作时间限制之后,每位居民的平均总病例数显着下降(949 +/- 18对911 +/- 14,P = 0.004)。亚分​​析显示消化道(217 +/- 7 vs 229 +/- 3,P = 0.004),皮肤/软组织(31 +/- 3 vs 36 +/- 1,P = 0.01)和内分泌显着增加(26 +/- 2 vs 31 +/- 2,P = 0.006)例。但是,我们观察到头颈(21 +/- 0.3 vs 20 +/- 0.3,P = 0.01),血管(164 +/- 29 vs 126 +/- 5,P = 0.01),儿科(2001年41 +/- 1 vs 37 +/- 2,P = 0.006),泌尿生殖系统疾病(10 +/- 2 vs 7 +/- 1,P = 0.004),妇科手术(5 +/- 1 vs 3 +/- 0.6) ,P = 0.002),塑料(16 +/- 0.3 vs 15 +/- 0.7,P = 0.03)和内窥镜检查(91 +/- 3 vs 82 +/- 2,P <0.001)。对ACGME编制的全国数据的分析证实,工作时间限制已严重影响了居民的工作经验。重要的是,由于消化道和内分泌病例的增加,似乎已经牺牲了专业领域的经验,包括血管和内窥镜检查,以将资源整合到一般外科服务中。这些发现提出了以下问题:真正基础广泛的普外科训练时代即将结束吗?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号