...
首页> 外文期刊>Pure and Applied Geophysics >Global Crust-Mantle Density Contrast Estimated from EGM2008, DTM2008, CRUST2.0, and ICE-5G
【24h】

Global Crust-Mantle Density Contrast Estimated from EGM2008, DTM2008, CRUST2.0, and ICE-5G

机译:根据EGM2008,DTM2008,CRUST2.0和ICE-5G估算的全球地幔幔密度对比

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We compute globally the consolidated crust-stripped gravity disturbances/anomalies. These refined gravity field quantities are obtained from the EGM2008 gravity data after applying the topographic and crust density contrasts stripping corrections computed using the global topography/bathymetry model DTM2006. 0, the global continental ice-thickness data ICE-5G, and the global crustal model CRUST2. 0. All crust components density contrasts are defined relative to the reference crustal density of 2,670 kg/m ~3. We demonstrate that the consolidated crust-stripped gravity data have the strongest correlation with the crustal thickness. Therefore, they are the most suitable gravity data type for the recovery of the Moho density interface by means of the gravimetric modelling or inversion. The consolidated crust-stripped gravity data and the CRUST2. 0 crust-thickness data are used to estimate the global average value of the crust-mantle density contrast. This is done by minimising the correlation between these refined gravity and crust-thickness data by adding the crust-mantle density contrast to the original reference crustal density of 2,670 kg/m ~3. The estimated values of 485 kg/m ~3 (for the refined gravity disturbances) and 481 kg/m ~3 (for the refined gravity anomalies) very closely agree with the value of the crust-mantle density contrast of 480 kg/m ~3, which is adopted in the definition of the Preliminary Reference Earth Model (PREM). This agreement is more likely due to the fact that our results of the gravimetric forward modelling are significantly constrained by the CRUST2. 0 model density structure and crust-thickness data derived purely based on methods of seismic refraction.
机译:我们在全球范围内计算固结地壳剥离的重力扰动/异常。这些精细的重力场量是在应用了地形和地壳密度对比剥离校正后从EGM2008重力数据获得的,该校正使用整体地形/测深模型DTM2006计算得出。 0,全球大陆冰厚数据ICE-5G,以及全球地壳模型CRUST2。 0.所有地壳成分密度对比是相对于参考地壳密度2670 kg / m〜3定义的。我们证明,整合的地壳剥离重力数据与地壳厚度具有最强的相关性。因此,它们是通过重力建模或反演来恢复Moho密度界面的最合适的重力数据类型。合并的地壳剥离重力数据和CRUST2。 0地壳厚度数据用于估计地壳幔密度对比的整体平均值。这是通过将地壳幔密度对比值添加到原始参考地壳密度2670 kg / m〜3来最小化这些精炼重力和地壳厚度数据之间的相关性来完成的。 485 kg / m〜3(对于精细重力扰动)和481 kg / m〜3(对于精细重力异常)的估计值与480 kg / m〜地壳幔密度对比的值非常接近3,它在初步参考地球模型(PREM)的定义中被采用。由于我们的重量正向建模结果受到CRUST2的明显限制,因此更可能达成该协议。 0模型密度结构和地壳厚度数据完全基于地震折射方法得出。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号