首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Editorial comment.
【24h】

Editorial comment.

机译:编辑评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The authors should be commended for studying the difficult population of men with stress incontinence after radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy. The authors report the outcomes for the AdVance sling and conclude that, in select patients, the procedure achieves a success rate of 50%, with results stable for a median follow-up of 18 months. They also state that treatment success is reduced compared with the reported success rates in patients who have not undergone radiotherapy. Some of the criticisms of this study are common to many reports on the outcomes after treatment of male stress incontinence. A careful reading of this report (and many others on the same topic) raises 2 important questions. First, whether the "success" rate is really 50%; and second, whether the outcomes are really worse in patients who have undergone adjuvant radiotherapy.
机译:对于研究前列腺癌根治术和放疗后压力性尿失禁的困难人群,作者应受到赞扬。作者报告了AdVance悬带的结局,并得出结论,在部分患者中,该过程成功率为50%,结果中位随访18个月,结果稳定。他们还指出,与未接受放射治疗的患者报道的成功率相比,治疗成功率降低了。许多关于男性压力性尿失禁治疗结果的报告对此研究的批评是普遍的。仔细阅读该报告(以及许多其他有关同一主题的报告)会提出两个重要问题。首先,“成功”率是否真的是50%?其次,接受辅助放疗的患者的结局是否真的较差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号