首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Editorial comment.
【24h】

Editorial comment.

机译:编辑评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The authors present a good population-based analysis of potential staging and prognostic value of lymphonode dis-section (lnd) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with nephroureterectomy without metastatses vs no lnd. Although no survival benefit was found, some important issues were addressed. The authors state that surgeons are good judges of who requires lnd and in whom it may be avoided. They also point toward the relative lack of standardized indications as well as templates for this surgery. It is important to indicate that Secine et al and Margulis et al already indicated the importance of lnd at the time of surgery as there is a limited accuracy of preoperative staging of the regional lnd. Also, Kikuchi et al and Roscigno et al showed that lymphovascular invasion may be an independent predictor of clinical outcomes in nonmetastatic patients. All these taken together, the studies by Kondo et al attempting to standardize the templates for this procedure are noteworthy.
机译:作者提供了一项基于人群的良好分析,该研究对不经转移而无转移的经肾结石切除术治疗的上路尿路上皮癌患者的淋巴结清扫术(lnd)的潜在分期和预后价值进行了分析。尽管没有发现生存优势,但仍解决了一些重要问题。作者指出,外科医生是谁需要lind以及谁可以避免的好判断。他们还指出相对缺乏标准化的适应症以及该手术的模板。重要的是要指出,Secine等人和Margulis等人已经指出了手术时lnd的重要性,因为该区域lnd的术前分期准确性有限。另外,Kikuchi等人和Roscigno等人表明,淋巴管浸润可能是非转移性患者临床预后的独立预测因子。所有这些结合在一起,Kondo等人试图标准化此程序模板的研究值得一提。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号