首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Editorial comment.
【24h】

Editorial comment.

机译:编辑评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Long time back, physicians knew little but were still confident in making definitive and often irreversible decisions. Today, we know much more and what we truly know is how little we really understand things and how our once obvious decisions may in the long run prove not to be supported by data. The philosophy of modem scientific medicine is based on the concepts of evidence and revision. Unlike other forms of thought and belief, which can have as their chief tenets, the concepts of absolute faith and unquestioning adherence, the practice of medicine has evolved and expanded in efficacy, in large part because we actively sought out data over assertion and belief and are willing to challenge and revise what we believe to be correct. The review by Yang, Disandro, and Baskin reflects our current momentary grasp of the situation.
机译:很久以前,医生们所知甚少,但仍然对做出确定且通常不可逆的决定充满信心。今天,我们知道的更多了,我们真正了解的是,我们对事物的了解很少,从长远来看,曾经明显的决定可能不会得到数据的支持。现代科学医学的哲学基于证据和修正的概念。不同于其他形式的思想和信念(其主要信条是绝对信念和毫无疑问的依从性),医学实践的有效性得到了发展和扩展,这在很大程度上是因为我们积极地寻求有关断言和信念的数据,以及愿意挑战和修改我们认为正确的内容。 Yang,Disandro和Baskin的评论反映了我们当前对局势的一时掌握。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号