首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Editorial comment.
【24h】

Editorial comment.

机译:编辑评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The usual technique of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is to begin at a low voltage level and increase the voltage in increments for a few hundred shocks until a target voltage has been reached. The goals are to minimize pain (and thereby minimize patient movement), enhance safety, and possibly enhance fragmentation.1'3 However, does voltage escalation amount to wasting several hundred shocks at too low a power? This randomized, double-blind SWL trial compared immediate vs delayed voltage escalation using the Phillips LithoTron litho-tripter. Notwithstanding some minor methodologic concerns, the study was conducted about as well as it could have been. The fragmentation and stone-free outcomes favored the immediate vs delayed voltage escalation strategy. Immediate voltage escalation required fewer shocks to achieve the first fragmentation and resulted in a better 3-month success rate, with trends favoring immediate voltage escalation for the 2-week and 3-month outcomes.
机译:冲击波碎石术(SWL)的常用技术是从低电压电平开始,并以数百次冲击为增量递增电压,直到达到目标电压为止。目标是最大程度地减少痛苦(从而最大程度地减少患者的活动),提高安全性并可能增加碎片化的风险。1'3但是,电压升高是否等于以太低的功率浪费了数百次电击?这项随机,双盲SWL试验比较了使用Phillips LithoTron碎石机进行的即时电压升级与延迟电压升级的比较。尽管有一些方法上的小问题,但仍进行了本应进行的研究。碎片化和无结石的结果有利于立即或延迟电压升级策略。立即的电压升级需要较少的电击才能实现第一次破碎,并获得了更好的3个月成功率,而且趋势倾向于2周和3个月的结果立即进行电压升级。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号