首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Editorial comment.
【24h】

Editorial comment.

机译:编辑评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this investigation, the authors report the frequency of use of medical expulsive therapy (MET) in patients diagnosed with acute renal colic in emergency departments in the United States. This information is obtained from an annually updated government-sponsored database containing a systematic random sample of physician reported data on patient presenting complaints, diagnoses, and medications orders. The use of MET doubled yearly from 2000 through 2006; however, average use over the period was very low at 1.1% and peak use in 2006 was only 3.9%. Given the evidence that MET spares 1 in 4 patients from the need for surgical intervention, this low usage was unable to spve significant patient suffering and health system expense. Despite some limitations of the study that may overestimate the eligible population, the fact remains that a large number of patients who could have benefited from MET did not have it prescribed.
机译:在这项调查中,作者报告了在美国急诊科诊断为急性肾绞痛的患者使用药物排除疗法(MET)的频率。该信息是从政府支持的年度更新数据库中获得的,该数据库包含系统的随机报告的医生报告的有关患者提出的投诉,诊断和用药顺序的数据。从2000年到2006年,MET的使用量每年增加一倍;但是,此期间的平均使用率非常低,仅为1.1%,2006年的高峰使用率仅为3.9%。鉴于有证据表明MET使四分之一的患者免于手术干预的需要,这种低使用率无法节省大量患者的痛苦和医疗系统费用。尽管研究的某些局限性可能高估了合格人群,但事实仍然是,许多可能从MET中受益的患者并未开具MET。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号