首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Editorial comment.
【24h】

Editorial comment.

机译:编辑评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although this questionnaire was performed in 2002, its findings reflect the unfortunate and paradoxical realities of contemporary urethral stricture care in 2011. Although endoscopic and robotic advancements have clearly transformed all facets of our specialty over the past decade, the only reason that new, minimally invasive treatments have entered the mainstream is that they have been shown to deliver comparable or superior outcomes in terms of safety and efficacy. Nowhere in urology are high failure rates accepted as routinely as they are with endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures.
机译:尽管此问卷于2002年进行,但其发现反映了2011年当代尿道狭窄护理的不幸和自相矛盾的现实。尽管内窥镜和机器人技术的发展已在过去十年中明显改变了我们专业的各个方面,这是新型,微创的唯一原因治疗已成为主流,因为在安全性和功效方面,它们已显示出可比或更好的结果。泌尿外科无处接受像内窥镜治疗尿道狭窄那样的高失败率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号