...
首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Editorial comment.
【24h】

Editorial comment.

机译:编辑评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This manuscript addresses the following question: "do prior urethral manipulations adversely affect the outcomes of urethral reconstruction, for traumatic posterior urethral strictures?" This question is of some importance as it relates to 2 issues, should these patients be treated in the acute phase with primary catheter realignment as has been suggested in recent years? And who should perform urethral reconstruction in these patients with posterior urethral traumatic strictures? The manuscript is based on a relatively small group of patients (58 patients during 13 years); thus, the study may not be robustly powered to make strong negative statements where statistical significance has not been reached. Median follow-up was also relatively short, that is, 31.5 months.
机译:该手稿解决了以下问题:“对于外伤性后尿道狭窄,以前的尿道操作是否会对尿道重建的结果产生不利影响?”这个问题很重要,因为它涉及到两个问题,这些患者是否应按照近年来的建议在急性期进行初次导管重新对准治疗?在这些患有后尿道创伤性狭窄的患者中,谁应该进行尿道重建?该手稿是基于相对较小的患者群体(13年中有58位患者);因此,在尚未达到统计显着性的地方,该研究可能无法做出强有力的负面陈述。中位随访时间也相对较短,即31.5个月。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号