首页> 外文期刊>Precambrian Research >Key paleomagnetic poles and their use in Proterozoic continent and supercontinent reconstructions: A review
【24h】

Key paleomagnetic poles and their use in Proterozoic continent and supercontinent reconstructions: A review

机译:关键古地磁极及其在元古代和超大陆重建中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Key paleomagnetic poles are poles that are well defined and precisely dated. The rock unit from which the pole is derived must have a precise (usually U-Pb) age and the pole itself must be demonstrated primary with a rigorous field test. The use of key poles is essential in defining reliable apparent polar wander paths (APWPs) and establishing continental reconstructions. Many hundreds of Proterozoic paleopoles have been published from around the globe, but only ~45 are from large craton interiors and pass the key pole criteria. Most key poles are from mafic dykes and sills in the Superior craton (pre-1.83Ga) or Laurentia (post-1.80 Ga) or Baltica. As a result, with occasional exceptions, it is difficult to define or compare reliable APWP segments in order to test Proterozoic continental reconstructions. However, there are now sufficient age matches or approximate age matches for pairs of key poles from a number of cratons to help constrain their relative locations. In this analysis, Proterozoic key poles are identified and their use in constructing APWPs and testing continent and supercontinent reconstructions is discussed. This key pole database establishes a well constrained Superior craton-Laurentia APWP for much of the Proterozoic that can be used as a reference track against which a growing number of individual key poles from other cratons can be compared. There is now a robust Baltica-Laurentia reconstruction for ~330 m.y. between 1.59 and 1.26 Ga using this approach and potentially for ~570 m.y. between 1.83 and 1.26 Ga if additional key and non-key poles from well-dated units are considered. Key pole comparisons for several other cratons yield preliminary constraints on the relative movement of cratons (e.g., Slave and Superior cratons in the Paleoproterozoic) or on specific elements of continental reconstructions (e.g., Amazonia and Baltica in the Mesoproterozoic, South China craton and Australia in the Neoproterozoic, or Baltica and Laurentia also in the Neoproterozoic).
机译:关键的古磁极是定义明确且日期准确的极。派生极点的岩石单元必须具有精确的(通常为U-Pb)年龄,并且必须通过严格的现场测试证明极点本身是主要的。关键极点的使用对于定义可靠的视在极地游荡路径(APWP)和建立大陆重建至关重要。全球已有数百个古生代古极公布,但只有约45个来自克拉通内部,且符合关键极地判据。大多数关键极点来自上克拉通(1.83Ga之前)或Laurentia(1.80 Ga之后)或Baltica的黑手党堤坝和基石。结果,除了偶然的例外,很难定义或比较可靠的APWP段以测试元古代大陆重建。但是,现在有足够的年龄匹配项或近似年龄匹配项,用于来自多个克拉通的一对钥匙杆,以帮助约束它们的相对位置。在此分析中,确定了元古代关键极点,并讨论了它们在构造APWP以及测试大陆和超大陆重建中的用途。这个关键杆数据库为大部分元古代建立了一个受严格限制的上克拉通-劳伦西亚APWP,可以用作参考轨迹,与之比较的其他克拉通数量越来越多的单个关键杆。现在有一个健壮的Baltica-Laurentia重建区,建于〜330m.y。在1.59至1.26 Ga之间使用这种方法,潜在的时间约为570m.y。如果考虑到来自良好日期装置的其他键极和非键极,则在1.83至1.26 Ga之间。其他几个克拉通的关键极点比较对克拉通的相对运动(例如,古元古代的奴隶和上等克拉通)或大陆重建的特定要素(例如中元古生界的亚马逊河和波罗的海,华南克拉通和澳大利亚)产生了初步限制。新元古代,或波罗的海和劳伦西亚也都在新元古代)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号