首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of agar dilution, tube dilution, and broth microdilution susceptibility tests for determination of ramoplanin MICs.
【24h】

Comparison of agar dilution, tube dilution, and broth microdilution susceptibility tests for determination of ramoplanin MICs.

机译:琼脂稀释液,试管稀释液和肉汤微稀释液敏感性试验用于确定雷莫拉宁MIC的比较。

获取原文
           

摘要

Standard broth microdilution (with and without bovine serum albumin [BSA] supplementation), tube dilution, and agar dilution susceptibility tests were compared for determining ramoplanin MICs. With a data base of 246 clinical isolates of gram-positive bacteria from 33 U.S. sites, it was shown that (i) agar and tube dilution susceptibility tests gave essentially the same results (93.9% of the test results were within 1 doubling dilution of equivalence), (ii) broth microdilution susceptibility tests gave results up to 5 doubling dilutions higher than agar or tube assays, and (iii) this data skewing could be reversed by BSA supplementation (final concentration, 0.02%) of the broth microdilution test medium.
机译:比较了标准肉汤微稀释液(添加和不添加牛血清白蛋白[BSA]),试管稀释度和琼脂稀释度敏感性测试,以确定雷莫拉宁MIC。利用来自33个美国地点的246株革兰氏阳性细菌临床分离株的数据库,结果表明:(i)琼脂和试管稀释液药敏试验给出的结果基本相同(93.9%的试验结果在当量稀释度的1倍之内),(ii)肉汤微稀释液敏感性测试结果比琼脂或试管法高出5倍,并且(iii)肉汤微稀释度测试介质的BSA补充(最终浓度为0.02%)可以逆转这种数据偏差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号