首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Let's Not Miss the Forest for the Trees: A Reply to Montefinese and Vinson's (2015) Commentary on Vieth et al. (2014)
【24h】

Let's Not Miss the Forest for the Trees: A Reply to Montefinese and Vinson's (2015) Commentary on Vieth et al. (2014)

机译:让我们不要错过树木茂密的森林:对Montefinese和Vinson(2015)关于Vieth等人的评论。 (2014年)

获取原文
       

摘要

In Vieth et al. (2014a), we conducted three experiments to examine semantic relatedness effects in the picture-word interference (PWI) paradigm. According to the lexical selection by competition account of spoken word production, feature overlap between the target picture and related distractor word induces semantic interference. However, this account has been challenged by studies demonstrating semantic facilitation in the PWI paradigm (e.g., Costa et al., 2005; Mahon et al., 2007; but see Hutson and Damian, 2014; Sailor and Brooks, 2014; Vieth et al., 2014b). In Vieth et al. (2014a), we investigated whether some reports of semantic facilitation in PWI might be due to the influence of distinctive features, i.e., features that quickly distinguish a concept from other similar concepts, as previous studies had not controlled for this variable (e.g., Costa et al., 2005; Mahon et al., 2007; Sailor and Brooks, 2014). In Experiment 3, we observed semantic interference for distractor words denoting a non-distinctive feature (e.g., knee) visible in the target picture (e.g., CAMEL), but no interference for distractor words denoting a distinctive feature (e.g., hump) compared to matched sets of distractors denoting unrelated features. We argued this finding is consistent with lexical selection by competition accounts, and might entail additional spread of activation to related concepts that share the non-distinctive feature via the appropriate category node (e.g., Animals). In their commentary, Montefinese and Vinson (2015) arrive at the opposite conclusion, arguing that feature distinctiveness does not affect the degree of interference in PWI. Here, we respond to each of their objections.
机译:在Vieth等人中。 (2014a),我们进行了三个实验来检验图片词干扰(PWI)范式中的语义相关性效应。根据口头词产生竞争性的词汇选择,目标图片和相关干扰词之间的特征重叠会引起语义干扰。然而,这一论据一直受到证明PWI范式中语义促进的研究的挑战(例如,Costa等人,2005; Mahon等人,2007;但请参见Hutson和Damian,2014; Sailor和Brooks,2014; Vieth等人)。 。,2014b)。在Vieth等人中。 (2014a),我们调查了PWI中一些促进语义化的报告是否可能是由于独特特征的影响,即先前的研究并未控制该变量(例如,Costa等人,2005; Mahon等人,2007; Sailor and Brooks,2014)。在实验3中,我们观察到干扰词对表示目标图片(例如,CAMEL)中可见的非区别特征(例如,膝盖)的语义干扰,但与干扰词相比,与众不同的特征(例如,驼峰)表示干扰,没有干扰。匹配的分散器集合,表示无关的特征。我们认为这一发现与竞争账户的词汇选择相一致,并且可能需要通过适当的类别节点(例如动物)将激活进一步扩展到共享非区别特征的相关概念。 Montefinese和Vinson(2015)在评论中得出相反的结论,认为特征的独特性不会影响PWI的干扰程度。在这里,我们回应他们的每个反对意见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号