首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Life Sciences >Pseudoscience - in Theory and Practice: A Reply to Shanta and Muni’s ‘Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?’
【24h】

Pseudoscience - in Theory and Practice: A Reply to Shanta and Muni’s ‘Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?’

机译:伪科学-在理论和实践中:对Shanta和Muni的“为什么生物学超越物理科学?”的回复

获取原文
       

摘要

The recent intrusion of pseudoscience into mainstream scientific literature is a cause for concern. Not only does it disseminate incorrect science, but also undermines the integrity of the scientific enterprise. B. N. Shanta and B. V. Muni’s recent opinion piece is one such example that claims that the scientific method is too narrow in scope to completely understand subjective aspects of life, and proposes the necessity for a supernatural entity in accordance to ancient scriptures of Hindu Theology. To convince readers of the necessity for such an alternative, the authors reject accepted scientific theories such as Evolution by Natural Selection. In this reply, I demonstrate how their views are pseudoscientific and do not deserve a place in scientific literature.
机译:伪科学最近侵入主流科学文献的现象令人担忧。它不仅传播错误的科学,而且破坏科学事业的完整性。香塔(B. N. Shanta)和B. V.穆尼(B. V. Muni)最近的观点就是一个这样的例子,声称科学方法的范围太狭窄,无法完全理解生活的主观方面,并根据印度教神学的古代经文提出了超自然实体的必要性。为了使读者相信采用这种替代方法的必要性,作者拒绝接受公认的科学理论,例如“自然选择进化”。在此答复中,我演示了他们的观点是伪科学的,不应在科学文献中占有一席之地。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号