首页> 外文期刊>World trade review >United states - definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties on certain products from china: passing the buck on pass-through
【24h】

United states - definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties on certain products from china: passing the buck on pass-through

机译:美国-对来自中国的某些产品征收确定的反倾销税和反补贴税:推卸责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 2007, the United States reversed its long-standing policy prohibiting the simultaneous imposition of anti-dumping duties (ADDs) and countervailing duties (CVDs) against nonmarket economies. Subsequently, the United States has imposed concurrent ADDs and CVDs in numerous cases against China. China challenged a number of aspects of the US practice, most notably the double-remedies issue, which occurs when a domestic subsidy is offset by both an ADD and CVD. The Appellate Body (AB) correctly ruled that double remedies are inconsistent with the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures and that the burden was on the investigating authorities to ensure that double remedies were not being imposed; however, the AB largely limited its discussion to measurement concerns, an approach that may have inadvertently opened the door to future double-remedies disputes involving other methods for computing normal value. Two other issues that are likely to have significant long-term ramifications are (i) the scope of the term 'public body' and (ii) the appropriate use of out-of-country benchmarks. On both issues, we believe the AB's conclusions and analysis were correct.
机译:2007年,美国扭转了其长期政策,即禁止对非市场经济体同时征收反倾销税(ADD)和反补贴税(CVD)。随后,美国在无数案件中对中国施加了同时加用的ADD和CVD。中国对美国做法的许多方面提出了挑战,最明显的是双重补救问题,当国内补贴被ADD和CVD抵消时就会发生。上诉机构(AB)正确地裁定双重补救措施与《补贴和反补贴措施协定》相抵触,调查当局有责任确保不实施双重补救措施;但是,AB很大程度上将其讨论限制在衡量问题上,这种方法可能无意中打开了涉及其他计算正常价值方法的未来双重救济纠纷的大门。可能会产生重大长期影响的其他两个问题是(i)“公共机构”一词的范围和(ii)适当使用国外基准。在这两个问题上,我们认为AB的结论和分析都是正确的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号