首页> 外文期刊>World trade review >How Trade-Restrictive Is Standardized Packaging? Economic and Legal Implications of the WTO Panel Reports in Australia-Tobacco Plain Packaging
【24h】

How Trade-Restrictive Is Standardized Packaging? Economic and Legal Implications of the WTO Panel Reports in Australia-Tobacco Plain Packaging

机译:贸易限制性如何标准化包装? WTO小组在澳大利亚 - 烟草普通包装中的经济和法律影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The lengthy and long-awaited WTO Panel Reports in Australia-Tobacco Plain Packaging contain a host of material for reflection, particularly in relation to the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) and the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. While two of the Panel Reports proceed to appeal, we consider with respect to the two adopted Panel Reports the Panel's reasoning in relation to Article 2.2 of the TBT, focusing on the meaning of trade-restrictiveness. This concept central to WTO law has been under-examined to date, and these Panel Reports demonstrate some of the complexities in identifying trade-restrictive measures, particularly where they are non-discriminatory. The Panel found that Australia's measures restrict trade because they contribute to their objective of reducing tobacco consumption. Therefore, any equally effective alternative will similarly restrict trade. This curious result under TBT Article 2.2 may be particular to non-discriminatory measures that target 'socially bad' products such as tobacco.
机译:澳大利亚 - 烟草普通包装的冗长和期待已久的WTO小组报告包含了一系列反思材料,特别是关于贸易技术壁垒协议和知识产权贸易相关方面的协议。虽然两个小组报告进行上诉,但我们考虑到两组通过的小组报告了小组的推理与TBT第2.2条,重点是贸易限制性的意义。这一概念迄今为止审查了WTO法律的核心法律,这些小组报告展示了一些识别贸易限制性措施的复杂性,特别是在非歧视性的地方。小组发现,澳大利亚的措施限制了贸易,因为它们有助于减少烟草消费的目标。因此,任何同样有效的替代方案都会类似地限制贸易。在TBT第2.2条下的这种好奇的结果可能是针对烟草等“社会坏”产品的非歧视性措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号