首页> 外文期刊>World review of science, technology and sustainable development >A critical review of the discrepancy between the spatial planning map and the spatial planning regulation of agricultural lands in Indonesia: Kulon Progo Regency case study
【24h】

A critical review of the discrepancy between the spatial planning map and the spatial planning regulation of agricultural lands in Indonesia: Kulon Progo Regency case study

机译:空间规划地图与印度尼西亚农业土地空间规划监管差异的关键综述:Kulon Progo Regency Case研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This research critically investigates discrepancies between the spatial planning map and the spatial planning regulation of agricultural land in Kulon Progo Regency, the Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Data were analysed using jurimetrics, which were employed to explore the spatial map as a legal document listed in the appendix of regulation through the geographic information system (GIS) analysis. The study offers a critical review of the discrepancy between the spatial planning map and the spatial planning regulation for agricultural land; it demonstrates the consistency and inconsistency between the spatial patterns and the regulatory order of spatial management. Its findings show differences in spatial function in the same coordinates, despite the use of geospatial technology. Based on Loevinger's jurimetrics theory and Kelsen's pure theory of law, it is suggested that policy makers attend to the spatial map appendix and use jurimetrics in the area of law.
机译:本研究批判性地调查了空间规划地图与kulon Progo Regency农业土地的空间规划监管,是印度尼西亚日惹特区的kulon Progo Regency。使用判例分析数据,该数据被用于通过地理信息系统(GIS)分析来探索作为规定附录中列出的法律文件的空间地图。该研究提供了对空间规划地图与农业土地空间规划规定的差异的关键综述;它展示了空间模式与空间管理的监管顺序之间的一致性和不一致。尽管使用地理空间技术,其调查结果显示了相同坐标中的空间功能的差异。基于Loevinger的判例理论和Kelsen的纯粹理论,建议政策制定者参加空间地图附录并在法律领域使用判例。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号