首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Urology >Comparison of unilateral renal artery embolization versus bilateral for treatment of severe refractory hypertension in hemodialysis patients
【24h】

Comparison of unilateral renal artery embolization versus bilateral for treatment of severe refractory hypertension in hemodialysis patients

机译:单侧肾动脉栓塞术与双侧肾动脉栓塞术治疗血液透析患者重度难治性高血压的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective Hypertension in ESRD patients is common, and often refractory to common medical interventions. Bilateral renal embolization (BRE) is an alternative to nephrectomy in treating severe refractory hypertension in hemodialysis patients, but has drawbacks in residual renal function preservation and post-infarction syndrome. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of unilateral renal embolization (URE) for the treatment of severe refractory hypertension in hemodialysis patients.
机译:目的ESRD患者的高血压很常见,并且通常无法通过常规的医学干预措施来治疗。双边肾栓塞术(BRE)是肾切除术的替代方法,可用于治疗血液透析患者的严重难治性高血压,但在保留残余肾功能和梗死后综合征方面存在缺陷。我们评估了单侧肾栓塞术(URE)在血液透析患者中​​治疗严重难治性高血压的疗效和安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号