...
首页> 外文期刊>Working Paper Series >AN EMPIRICAL DECOMPOSITION OF RISK AND LIQUIDITY IN NOMINAL AND INFLATION-INDEXED GOVERNMENT BONDS
【24h】

AN EMPIRICAL DECOMPOSITION OF RISK AND LIQUIDITY IN NOMINAL AND INFLATION-INDEXED GOVERNMENT BONDS

机译:名义和通货膨胀政府债券中风险和流动性的经验分解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper decomposes the excess return predictability in inflation-indexed and nominal government bonds into effects from liquidity, market segmentation, real interest rate risk and inflation risk. We estimate a large and variable liquidity premium in US Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) from the co-movement of breakeven inflation with liquidity proxies. The liquidity premium is around 70 basis points in normal times, but much larger during the early years of TIPS issuance and during the height of the financial crisis in 2008-2009. The liquidity premium explains the high excess returns on TIPS as compared to nominal Treasuries over the period 1999-2009. Liquidity-adjusted breakeven inflation appears stable, suggesting stable inflation expectations over our sample period. We find predictability in both inflation-indexed bond excess returns and in the spread between nominal and inflation-indexed bond excess returns even after adjusting for liquidity, providing evidence for both time-varying real interest rate risk premia and time-varying inflation risk premia. Liquidity appears uncorrelated with real interest rate and inflation risk premia. We test whether bond return predictability is due to segmentation between nominal and inflation-indexed bond markets but find no evidence in either the US or in the UK.
机译:本文将通货膨胀指数和名义政府债券的超额收益可预测性分解为流动性,市场细分,实际利率风险和通货膨胀风险的影响。我们通过盈亏平衡通货膨胀与流动性代理的共同作用,估计美国国债通货膨胀保护证券(TIPS)的流动性溢价存在较大差异。通常情况下,流动性溢价约为70个基点,但在TIPS发行初期和2008-2009年金融危机最严重的时期,流动性溢价要大得多。流动性溢价解释了1999-2009年期间TIPS与名义国库券相比的高额超额收益。流动性调整后的盈亏平衡通货膨胀率似乎保持稳定,这表明我们样本期内的通货膨胀预期稳定。即使在对流动性进行调整之后,我们也发现了通胀指数债券超额收益以及名义和通胀指数债券超额收益之间的价差具有可预测性,这为时变的实际利率风险溢价和时变的通胀风险溢价提供了证据。流动性似乎与实际利率和通胀风险溢价无关。我们测试了债券收益的可预测性是否是由于名义和通胀指数化债券市场之间的分割所致,但在美国或英国均未发现任何证据。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Working Paper Series》 |2011年第16892期|p.0-38|共39页
  • 作者单位

    Harvard Business School Boston MA 02163;

    rnGeorge E. Bates Harvard Business School Baker Library 367 Boston, MA 02163 and NBER;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号