首页> 外文期刊>Working Paper Series. Monetary Economics >INTERNATIONAL MONETARY RELATIONS: TAKING FINANCE SERIOUSLY
【24h】

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY RELATIONS: TAKING FINANCE SERIOUSLY

机译:国际货币关系:认真融资

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In our book, Global Capital Markets: Integration, Crisis, and Growth, we traced out the evolution of the international monetary system using the framework of the "international monetary trilemma": countries can enjoy at most two from the set {exchange-rate stability, open capital markets, and domestic monetary autonomy}. The events of the past decade or more highlight the further complications for this framework posed by financial stability issues. Here we update and qualify our prior analysis, drawing on recent experience and research. Under the classical gold standard, scant attention was paid to macro management, either to stabilize output and employment or to ensure financial stability. The interwar years highlighted the changing demands for modern central bank interventions in the economy. Financial instability, followed by WWII, left a world with sharply constricted financial markets and little private cross-border capital mobility. Due to this historical accident, the Bretton Woods system agreed in 1944 focused not at all on financial stability, and focused on issues like adjustment, exchange rate misalignment, and international liquidity (defined in terms of official, not private, capital-account transactions). Post 1970s floating rates permitted, but did not require, liberalization of the capital account. But the political equilibrium had shifted in favor of financial interests, signaled by the push toward European integration and the later reform process in emerging markets starting in the 1990s. This development, however, opened the door once again to domestic financial crises and their international transmission. Countries now become more susceptible to a new species of "capital account crises," fueled by bank and bond lending, and its sudden withdrawal. These developments, in fact, made evident a different, "financial trilemma": countries can pick at most two from {financial stability, open capital markets, and autonomy over domestic financial policy}. We distill the main lessons as to the interactions between the monetary and financial trilemmas, and policies that could best address the resulting weaknesses.
机译:在我们的《全球资本市场:一体化,危机与增长》一书中,我们使用“国际货币三难困境”框架追溯了国际货币体系的演变:各国可以从{{ ,开放的资本市场和国内货币自治权}。过去十年或更长时间的事件凸显了金融稳定问题给该框架带来的进一步复杂性。在这里,我们会根据最近的经验和研究来更新和验证我们先前的分析。在经典的金本位制下,人们很少注意宏观管理,以稳定产出和就业或确保金融稳定。两次世界大战之间的年代突显了对现代中央银行干预经济的不断变化的需求。第二次世界大战之后,金融动荡使世界金融市场严重收缩,私人跨境资本流动性极低。由于这次历史性事故,布雷顿森林体系于1944年达成协议,根本不把重点放在金融稳定性上,而把重点放在诸如调整,汇率错位和国际流动性(定义为官方而非私人资本帐户交易)等问题上。 。 1970年代后的浮动汇率允许但不要求开放资本账户。但是,从1990年代开始,欧洲一体化的推动和后来新兴市场的改革进程标志着政治平衡已转向金融利益。然而,这一事态发展再次打开了国内金融危机及其国际传播的大门。现在,由于银行和债券借贷及其突然撤出,各国变得更容易受到新的“资本账户危机”的影响。实际上,这些事态发展表明存在一个不同的“金融困境”:各国可以从{金融稳定,开放的资本市场和对国内金融政策的自主权}中选择最多两个。我们从主要的经验教训中汲取了关于货币和金融两难困境以及可以最好地解决由此产生的弱点的政策之间的相互作用的经验。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Working Paper Series. Monetary Economics》 |2017年第23440期|QT001-QT002|共2页
  • 作者单位

    International Monetary Fund Research Department 700 19th Street NW Washington, DC 20431 and NBER;

    Department of Economics and Graduate School of Management University of California One Shields Ave Davis, CA 95616-8578 and CEPR and also NBER;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号