首页> 外文期刊>Working Paper Series >Financial Markets and Fiscal Unions
【24h】

Financial Markets and Fiscal Unions

机译:金融市场和财政联盟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Do sophisticated international financial markets obviate the need for an active union-wide authority to orchestrate fiscal transfers between countries to provide adequate insurance against country-specific economic fluctuations? We argue that they do. Specifically, we show that in a benchmark economy with no international financial markets, an activist union-wide authority is necessary to achieve desirable outcomes. With sophisticated financial markets, however, such an authority is unnecessary if its only goal is to provide cross-country insurance. Since restricting the set of policy instruments available to member countries does not create a fiscal externality across them, this result holds in a wide variety of settings. Finally, we establish that an activist union-wide authority concerned just with providing insurance across member countries is optimal only when individual countries are either unable or unwilling to pursue desirable policies.
机译:复杂的国际金融市场是否消除了需要在整个工会范围内发挥积极作用来协调国家之间的财政转移以提供针对特定国家的经济波动的足够保险的必要性?我们认为他们这样做。具体而言,我们表明,在没有国际金融市场的基准经济体中,必须在整个工会范围内采取积极行动,才能取得理想的结果。但是,在复杂的金融市场中,如果这样的机构的唯一目标是提供跨国保险,则它是不必要的。由于限制成员国可用的一系列政策工具不会在成员国之间造成财政外部性,因此,这种结果存在于各种各样的环境中。最后,我们确定,仅当个别国家无法或不愿推行理想的政策时,仅在成员国之间提供保险的,涉及整个工会的激进主义权力机构才是最佳选择。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Working Paper Series》 |2017年第23235期|1-45qt00-qt01|共47页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Economics Stanford University 579 Serra Mall Stanford, CA 94305 and NBER;

    Department of Economics University of Minnesota 4-101 Hanson Hall 1925 Fourth Street South Minneapolis, MN 55455 and the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号